» Articles » PMID: 24328638

The Impact of Smoke-free Laws on Asthma Discharges: a Multistate Analysis

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2013 Dec 17
PMID 24328638
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This is the first, to my knowledge, multistate, county-level analysis of Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project state inpatient data to examine the relationship between smoke-free laws and asthma discharges.

Methods: I used treatment and control groups to examine the effects of state and county or city smoke-free laws separately and together (2002-2009). I compared quarterly county-level discharge rates before and after the implementation of 12 state smoke-free laws, accounting for counties with preexisting county or city smoke-free laws and using the data from 5 states without state smoke-free laws as a control group. I used difference-in-differences models, controlling for year and state fixed effects, state cigarette taxes, seasonality, and numerous county-level factors.

Results: I observed statistically significant reductions in asthma discharges after the implementation of county smoke-free laws but no statistically significant effect of state laws besides the effect of county laws or of state laws alone. There was also no statistically significant effect of any smoke-free law on appendicitis discharges.

Conclusions: It may be unwise to pursue state smoke-free laws where they have yet to pass; rather, efforts might be better focused at the local level, where there is evidence of a significant impact.

Citing Articles

An Association Between State Laws Limiting Local Control and Community Smoke-Free Indoor Air in the United States.

Azagba S, Ebling T, Korkmaz A, Jensen J, Qeadan F, Hall M J Prim Care Community Health. 2024; 15:21501319241280905.

PMID: 39279342 PMC: 11403690. DOI: 10.1177/21501319241280905.


Sociodemographic factors, health behavior, parental or workplace smoking, and adult asthma risk in the United States.

Alwadeai K Work. 2024; 77(4):1115-1124.

PMID: 38306078 PMC: 11091600. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-230026.


Evaluation of Population-Level Tobacco Control Interventions and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Akter S, Islam M, Rahman M, Rouyard T, Nsashiyi R, Hossain F JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(7):e2322341.

PMID: 37418258 PMC: 10329215. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22341.


Association of smoke-free laws with preterm or low birth weight deliveries-A multistate analysis.

Ji X, Cox S, Grosse S, Barfield W, Armour B, Courtney-Long E Health Serv Res. 2020; 56(1):61-72.

PMID: 32875549 PMC: 10581330. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13552.


Effect of tobacco control policies on perinatal and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Faber T, Kumar A, Mackenbach J, Millett C, Basu S, Sheikh A Lancet Public Health. 2017; 2(9):e420-e437.

PMID: 28944313 PMC: 5592249. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30144-5.


References
1.
Millett C, Lee J, Laverty A, Glantz S, Majeed A . Hospital admissions for childhood asthma after smoke-free legislation in England. Pediatrics. 2013; 131(2):e495-501. PMC: 4528337. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-2592. View

2.
Barnoya J, Glantz S . Cardiovascular effects of second-hand smoke help explain the benefits of smoke-free legislation on heart disease burden. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2007; 21(6):457-62. DOI: 10.1097/00005082-200611000-00008. View

3.
Siegel M, Carol J, Jordan J, Hobart R, Schoenmarklin S, DuMelle F . Preemption in tobacco control. Review of an emerging public health problem. JAMA. 1997; 278(10):858-63. DOI: 10.1001/jama.278.10.858. View

4.
Lemstra M, Neudorf C, Opondo J . Implications of a public smoking ban. Can J Public Health. 2008; 99(1):62-5. PMC: 6975881. View

5.
Thomson C, Fisher L, Winickoff J, Colditz G, Camargo Jr C, King 3rd C . State tobacco excise taxes and adolescent smoking behaviors in the United States. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2005; 10(6):490-6. DOI: 10.1097/00124784-200411000-00003. View