» Articles » PMID: 24326181

Predicting Mandibular Growth Increment on the Basis of Cervical Vertebral Dimensions in Iranian Girls

Overview
Journal Prog Orthod
Publisher Springer
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2013 Dec 12
PMID 24326181
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The purpose of this longitudinal study was to establish an equation to predict incremental mandibular length on the basis of the analysis of the cervical vertebrae on a single cephalometric radiograph and to compare the predictive accuracy with the method by Mito et al.

Methods: Data consist of a group of 33 Iranian girls, 9 to 11 years old with two lateral cephalometric radiographs taken at a 24-month interval. For each individual, on the lateral cephalometric radiographs, points and lines for the description of the morphologic characteristics of the third and fourth cervical vertebral bodies were traced and measured. The real mandibular length increment (MLI) in this period was determined by the difference between the second (24 months) and first (baseline) radiographs: MLI=Ar-Pog (second)-Ar-Pog (first). An equation was determined to calculate mandibular length increments on the basis of the measurements in the third and fourth cervical vertebral bodies. The predictive accuracy was assessed using multiple regression analysis.

Results: The adjusted R2 for this equation was 54.9% which is a reliable value for evaluating prediction accuracy .The average error between the predicted increment and the actual increment was 0.149 mm for our method and 5.87 mm for the method by Mito et al.

Discussion: There are two items that contributed to easier and better prediction accuracy in our equation: (1) higher R2 and (2) fewer independent variables. In our subjects, the prediction accuracy was lower when using Mito et al.'s method, which could be due to genetic and environmental factors and selected age range.

Conclusion: These results indicate that cervical vertebral measurements, obtained in lateral cephalograms, are able to predict properly the mandibular growth potential.

Citing Articles

Predicting Mandibular Growth Potential Based on Cervical Vertebral Bone Age Using Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs in a Sample of the Saudi Population.

Madiraju G, Almugla Y Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(19).

PMID: 39410549 PMC: 11475966. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14192145.


Validation of Machine Learning Models for Craniofacial Growth Prediction.

Kim E, Kuroda Y, Soeda Y, Koizumi S, Yamaguchi T Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(21).

PMID: 37958265 PMC: 10647775. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13213369.


Deep learning-based prediction of mandibular growth trend in children with anterior crossbite using cephalometric radiographs.

Zhang J, Lu H, Hou J, Wang Q, Yu F, Zhong C BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):28.

PMID: 36650491 PMC: 9843828. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-02734-4.


Quantitative Assessment of Posterior Maxillary Arch for Orthodontic Miniscrew Insertion Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Valizadeh S, Zafarmand A, Hassan Yazdi S, Ahsaie M Int J Dent. 2022; 2022:8257256.

PMID: 35662891 PMC: 9162861. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8257256.


Predictive accuracy of estimating mandibular growth potential by regression equation using cervical vertebral bone age.

Verma S, Tikku T, Khanna R, Maurya R, Srivastava K, Singh V Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 12(1):25-35.

PMID: 34188397 PMC: 8191547. DOI: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_264_20.


References
1.
Ball G, Woodside D, Tompson B, Hunter W, Posluns J . Relationship between cervical vertebral maturation and mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139(5):e455-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.01.035. View

2.
Chen F, Terada K, Hanada K . A special method of predicting mandibular growth potential for Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75(2):191-5. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)075<0187:ASMOPM>2.0.CO;2. View

3.
Haas D, Martinez D, Eckert G, Diers N . Measurements of mandibular length: a comparison of articulare vs condylion. Angle Orthod. 2001; 71(3):210-5. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)071<0210:MOMLAC>2.0.CO;2. View

4.
Kamal M, Goyal S . Comparative evaluation of hand wrist radiographs with cervical vertebrae for skeletal maturation in 10-12 years old children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006; 24(3):127-35. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.27901. View

5.
Alkhal H, Wong R, Rabie A . Correlation between chronological age, cervical vertebral maturation and Fishman's skeletal maturity indicators in southern Chinese. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(4):591-6. DOI: 10.2319/0003-3219(2008)078[0591:CBCACV]2.0.CO;2. View