» Articles » PMID: 24325128

GyneScan: an Improved Online Paradigm for Screening of Ovarian Cancer Via Tissue Characterization

Overview
Date 2013 Dec 12
PMID 24325128
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ovarian cancer is the fifth highest cause of cancer in women and the leading cause of death from gynecological cancers. Accurate diagnosis of ovarian cancer from acquired images is dependent on the expertise and experience of ultrasonographers or physicians, and is therefore, associated with inter observer variabilities. Computer Aided Diagnostic (CAD) techniques use a number of different data mining techniques to automatically predict the presence or absence of cancer, and therefore, are more reliable and accurate. A review of published literature in the field of CAD based ovarian cancer detection indicates that many studies use ultrasound images as the base for analysis. The key objective of this work is to propose an effective adjunct CAD technique called GyneScan for ovarian tumor detection in ultrasound images. In our proposed data mining framework, we extract several texture features based on first order statistics, Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix and run length matrix. The significant features selected using t-test are then used to train and test several supervised learning based classifiers such as Probabilistic Neural Networks (PNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), k-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Naive Bayes (NB). We evaluated the developed framework using 1300 benign and 1300 malignant images. Using 11 significant features in KNN/PNN classifiers, we were able to achieve 100% classification accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value in detecting ovarian tumor. Even though more validation using larger databases would better establish the robustness of our technique, the preliminary results are promising. This technique could be used as a reliable adjunct method to existing imaging modalities to provide a more confident second opinion on the presence/absence of ovarian tumor.

Citing Articles

GeneAI 3.0: powerful, novel, generalized hybrid and ensemble deep learning frameworks for miRNA species classification of stationary patterns from nucleotides.

Singh J, Khanna N, Rout R, Singh N, Laird J, Singh I Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7154.

PMID: 38531923 PMC: 11344070. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56786-9.


Revolutionizing Women's Health: A Comprehensive Review of Artificial Intelligence Advancements in Gynecology.

Brandao M, Mendes F, Martins M, Cardoso P, Macedo G, Mascarenhas T J Clin Med. 2024; 13(4).

PMID: 38398374 PMC: 10889757. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13041061.


Machine learning and radiomics for segmentation and classification of adnexal masses on ultrasound.

Barcroft J, Linton-Reid K, Landolfo C, Al-Memar M, Parker N, Kyriacou C NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024; 8(1):41.

PMID: 38378773 PMC: 10879532. DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00527-8.


Artificial Intelligence in Ultrasound Diagnoses of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mitchell S, Nikolopoulos M, El-Zarka A, Al-Karawi D, Al-Zaidi S, Ghai A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(2).

PMID: 38275863 PMC: 10813993. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020422.


Deep Learning Paradigm and Its Bias for Coronary Artery Wall Segmentation in Intravascular Ultrasound Scans: A Closer Look.

Kumari V, Kumar N, Kumar K S, Kumar A, Skandha S, Saxena S J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023; 10(12).

PMID: 38132653 PMC: 10743870. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10120485.


References
1.
Rajendra Acharya U, Sree S, Krishnan M, Saba L, Molinari F, Guerriero S . Ovarian tumor characterization using 3D ultrasound. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 11(6):543-52. DOI: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500272. View

2.
Barua A, Bitterman P, Bahr J, Basu S, Sheiner E, Bradaric M . Contrast-enhanced sonography depicts spontaneous ovarian cancer at early stages in a preclinical animal model. J Ultrasound Med. 2011; 30(3):333-45. PMC: 3105598. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2011.30.3.333. View

3.
Rajendra Acharya U, Sree S, Krishnan M, Molinari F, Garberoglio R, Suri J . Non-invasive automated 3D thyroid lesion classification in ultrasound: a class of ThyroScan™ systems. Ultrasonics. 2011; 52(4):508-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2011.11.003. View

4.
Jeong Y, Outwater E, Kang H . Imaging evaluation of ovarian masses. Radiographics. 2000; 20(5):1445-70. DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.20.5.g00se101445. View

5.
Hata T, Yanagihara T, Hayashi K, Yamashiro C, Ohnishi Y, Akiyama M . Three-dimensional ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian tumours: a preliminary study. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(3):858-61. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.3.858. View