» Articles » PMID: 24322751

Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis: Comparison with Other Scoring Systems in Predicting Severity and Organ Failure

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2013 Dec 11
PMID 24322751
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The early identification of severe acute pancreatitis is important for the management and for improving outcomes. The bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis (BISAP) has been considered as an accurate method for risk stratification in patients with acute pancreatitis. This study aimed to evaluate the comparative usefulness of the BISAP.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 303 patients with acute pancreatitis diagnosed at our hospital from March 2007 to December 2010. BISAP, APACHE-II, Ranson criteria, and CT severity index (CTSI) of all patients were calculated. We stratified the number of patiants with severe pancreatitis, pancreatic necrosis, and organ failure as well as the number of deaths by BISAP score. We used the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC) to compare BISAP with other scoring systems, C-reactive protein (CRP), hematocrit, and body mass index (BMI) with regard to prediction of severe acute pancreatitis, necrosis, organ failure, and death.

Results: Of the 303 patiants, 31 (10.2%) were classified as having severe acute pancreatitis. Organ failure occurred in 23 (7.6%) patients, pancreatic necrosis in 40 (13.2%), and death in 6 (2.0%). A BISAP score of 2 was a statistically significant cutoff value for the diagnosis of severe acute pancreatitis, organ failure, and mortality. AUCs for BISAP predicting severe pancreatitis and death were 0.80 and 0.86, respectively, which were similar to those for APACHE-II (0.80, 0.87) and Ranson criteria (0.74, 0.74) and greater than AUCs for CTSI (0.67, 0.42). The AUC for organ failure predicted by BISAP, APACHE-II, Ranson criteria, and CTSI was 0.93, 0.95, 0.84 and 0.57, respectively. AUCs for BISAP predicting severity, organ failure, and death were greater than those for CRP (0.69, 0.80, 0.72), hematocrit (0.45, 0.35, 0.14), and BMI (0.41, 0.47, 0.17).

Conclusion: The BISAP predicts severity, death, and especially organ failure in acute pancreatitis as well as APACHE-II does and better than Ranson criteria, CTSI, CRP, hematocrit, and BMI.

Citing Articles

Contemporary Approach to Acute Pancreatitis in Emergency Medicine.

Hawatian K, Sidani M, Hagerman T, Condon S, Chien C, Miller J J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025; 6(2):100063.

PMID: 40051813 PMC: 11883301. DOI: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100063.


Predictive value of the Ranson and BISAP scoring systems for the severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhu J, Wu L, Wang Y, Fang M, Liu Q, Zhang X PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0302046.

PMID: 38687745 PMC: 11060534. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302046.


Severe Acute Pancreatitis Prediction: A Model Derived From a Prospective Registry Cohort.

Barrera Gutierrez J, Greenburg I, Shah J, Acharya P, Cui M, Vivian E Cureus. 2023; 15(10):e46809.

PMID: 37954725 PMC: 10636501. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46809.


Acute pancreatitis: A review of diagnosis, severity prediction and prognosis assessment from imaging technology, scoring system and artificial intelligence.

Hu J, Zhao C, Wang S, Tu X, Huang W, Chen J World J Gastroenterol. 2023; 29(37):5268-5291.

PMID: 37899784 PMC: 10600804. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i37.5268.


Clinical usefulness of scoring systems to predict severe acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis with pre and post-test probability assessment.

Capurso G, Ponz de Leon Pisani R, Lauri G, Archibugi L, Hegyi P, Papachristou G United European Gastroenterol J. 2023; 11(9):825-836.

PMID: 37755341 PMC: 10637128. DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12464.