» Articles » PMID: 24319511

Perioperative, Oncological and Functional Outcomes of the First Robotic Prostatectomy Program in Quebec: Single Fellowship-trained Surgeon's Experience of 250 Cases

Overview
Specialty Urology
Date 2013 Dec 10
PMID 24319511
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is being increasingly done in Canada. Despite this, the Canadian literature lacks publications on the oncologic and functional outcomes of RARP. The objective of this study is to report the longest single surgeon experience in the province of Quebec.

Methods: We collected prospective data from 250 consecutive patients who underwent RARP by a single fellowship trained surgeon (AEH) from October 2006 to October 2012. Mean follow-up was 28 months (range: 1-72). The D'Amico risk stratification distribution was 34% in low-risk, 48% in intermediate-risk and 18% in high-risk groups.

Results: The mean operation time (±SD) was 194 ± 60.6 minutes, and estimated blood loss 318 ± 179 mL. The transfusion rate was only 0.4%. All procedures were completed robotically. The mean hospital stay was 1.2 days, and 88% of patients were discharged on postoperative day 1. The mean catheterization time was 7 days (range: 6-13). There were 2% major (Clavien III-IV) and 7.2% minor (Clavien I-II) postoperative complications, and no mortalities. On final pathology, 76% of patients were organ-confined and 70% specimen-confined. Pathological Gleason sum ≥7 accounted for 86%. Return of urinary continence (0-pads) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months was 73.3%, 83.5%, 92.3%, 96.5%, respectively. Potency rate (successful penetration with or without medication) at 6, 12, and 24 months was 49.3%, 85%, and 95.3%, respectively. Operative time and positive surgical margin (PSM) in organ-con-fined disease (pT2) decreased significantly after 50 cases. Seventeen patients (6.8%) had no undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at first visit (PSA <0.1 ng/mL). Of remaining 233 patients, biochemical recurrence (PSA >0.2 ng/mL) was 4.7% (11 patients), and another 3.4% (8 patients) received early salvage radiotherapy (rising PSA, but <0.2 ng/mL). No patients with undetectable PSA required salvage treatments within 6 months postoperatively.

Conclusions: Our results compare favourably with high-volume RARP programs, despite mainly intermediate- to high-risk disease. Initial learning curve was estimated to be 50 cases. Fellowship training was instrumental in achieving adequate functional and oncological outcomes, while maintaining low complications rate.

Citing Articles

Quadrifecta outcomes and their predictors following robotic radical prostatectomy: a study of newly established robotic center in India.

Aggarwal A, Singh M, Choudhary G, Singh V, Sandhu A, Bhirud D J Robot Surg. 2023; 17(5):2271-2277.

PMID: 37310526 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01622-x.


The learning curves of major laparoscopic and robotic procedures in urology: a systematic review.

Chahal B, Aydin A, Amin M, Khan A, Khan M, Ahmed K Int J Surg. 2023; 109(7):2037-2057.

PMID: 37132184 PMC: 10389344. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000345.


Evaluation of Biochemical Recurrence and Correlation with Various Parameters After Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: a Single Center Experience.

Singh M, Kathuria S, Jain S, Rasool S, Tyagi V, Gupta M Indian J Surg Oncol. 2022; 13(3):661-667.

PMID: 36187532 PMC: 9515285. DOI: 10.1007/s13193-022-01554-2.


Learning curves in laparoscopic and robot-assisted prostate surgery: a systematic search and review.

Grivas N, Zachos I, Georgiadis G, Karavitakis M, Tzortzis V, Mamoulakis C World J Urol. 2021; 40(4):929-949.

PMID: 34480591 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03815-1.


Pathological features of prostate cancer in men treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Middle East.

Aldousari S, Yaiesh S, Alkandari O, Hussein S J Robot Surg. 2020; 15(1):125-133.

PMID: 32378083 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01089-0.


References
1.
Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Doublet J, Baumert H, Vallancien G . Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2002; 43(2):123-33. DOI: 10.1016/s1040-8428(02)00024-0. View

2.
Karakiewicz P, Tanguay S, Kattan M, Elhilali M, Aprikian A . Erectile and urinary dysfunction after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in Quebec: a population-based study of 2415 men. Eur Urol. 2004; 46(2):188-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.04.020. View

3.
Jacobsen N, Moore K, Estey E, Voaklander D . Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of postoperative urinary incontinence rates. J Urol. 2007; 177(2):615-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.022. View

4.
Clavien P, Sanabria J, Strasberg S . Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992; 111(5):518-26. View

5.
Schover L, Fouladi R, Warneke C, Neese L, Klein E, Zippe C . Defining sexual outcomes after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2002; 95(8):1773-85. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10848. View