» Articles » PMID: 24312066

When Co-action Eliminates the Simon Effect: Disentangling the Impact of Co-actor's Presence and Task Sharing on Joint-task Performance

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2013 Dec 7
PMID 24312066
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed at assessing whether the mere belief of performing a task with another person, who is in charge of the complementary part of the task, is sufficient for the so-called joint Simon effect to occur. In all three experiments of the study, participants sat alone in a room and underwent two consecutive Go/NoGo tasks that were identical except for the instructions. In Experiment 1, participants performed the task first individually (baseline task), and then either co-acting with another person who responded from an unknown location to the NoGo stimuli (joint task) or imaging themselves responding to the NoGo stimuli (imaginative task). Relative to the baseline, the instructions of the imaginative task made the Simon effect occur, while those of the joint task were ineffective in eliciting the effect. This result suggests that sharing a task with a person who is known to be in charge of the complementary task, but is not physically present, is not sufficient to induce the representation of an alternative response able to produce interference, which happens instead when the instructions explicitly require to imagine such a response. Interestingly, we observed that when the Simon effect was already present in the baseline task (i.e., when the response alternative to the Go response was represented in the individual task due to non-social factors), it disappeared in the joint task. We propose that, when no information about the co-actor's position is available, the division of labor between the participant and co-actor allows participants to filter out the possible (incidental) representation of the alternative response from their task representation, thus eliminating potential sources of interference. This account is supported by the results of Experiments 2 and 3 and suggests that under certain circumstances task-sharing may reduce the interference produced by the irrelevant information, rather than increase it.

Citing Articles

Effect of virtual interactions through avatar agents on the joint Simon effect.

Harada Y, Arima Y, Okada M PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317091.

PMID: 39792901 PMC: 11723602. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317091.


Reaction time coupling in a joint stimulus-response task: A matter of functional actions or likable agents?.

Schielen Z, Verhaegh J, Dijkerman C, Naber M PLoS One. 2022; 17(7):e0271164.

PMID: 35819966 PMC: 9275686. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271164.


Spatial auditory presentation of a partner's presence induces the social Simon effect.

Kiridoshi A, Otani M, Teramoto W Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):5637.

PMID: 35379870 PMC: 8980102. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09628-5.


Joint Simon effect in movement trajectories.

Sangati E, Slors M, Muller B, van Rooij I PLoS One. 2021; 16(12):e0261735.

PMID: 34965256 PMC: 8716062. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261735.


Effect of perceived interpersonal closeness on the joint Simon effect in adolescents and adults.

Shafaei R, Bahmani Z, Bahrami B, Vaziri-Pashkam M Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):18107.

PMID: 33093544 PMC: 7582195. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74859-3.


References
1.
Muller B, Brass M, Kuhn S, Tsai C, Nieuwboer W, Dijksterhuis A . When Pinocchio acts like a human, a wooden hand becomes embodied. Action co-representation for non-biological agents. Neuropsychologia. 2011; 49(5):1373-1377. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.022. View

2.
Welsh T, Higgins L, Ray M, Weeks D . Seeing vs. believing: Is believing sufficient to activate the processes of response co-representation?. Hum Mov Sci. 2007; 26(6):853-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.06.003. View

3.
Sebanz N, Bekkering H, Knoblich G . Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006; 10(2):70-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009. View

4.
Hommel B . The role of attention for the Simon effect. Psychol Res. 1993; 55(3):208-22. DOI: 10.1007/BF00419608. View

5.
Dittrich K, Dolk T, Rothe-Wulf A, Klauer K, Prinz W . Keys and seats: Spatial response coding underlying the joint spatial compatibility effect. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013; 75(8):1725-36. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0524-z. View