» Articles » PMID: 24310310

Preferences for Results Delivery from Exome Sequencing/genome Sequencing

Overview
Journal Genet Med
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Genetics
Date 2013 Dec 7
PMID 24310310
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore the implications of sequencing information and stated preferences for return of results among research participants.

Methods: Six focus groups were held with 39 ClinSeq participants. The groups included participants who had received results, those who had not, those affected with cardiovascular disease, and healthy adults. Audio recordings of the sessions were transcribed and coded and analyzed for themes.

Results: All participants expressed interest in receiving results that are medically actionable, nonactionable, carrier, and less so variants that cannot be interpreted. Most participants preferred to receive results in person, although several endorsed use of Internet-based resources that they could return to. Participants identified benefits for health management along with satisfying curiosity, making scientific contributions, and partnering in research. Value was seen in gaining control over health risks. Concerns were distress and/or fear that may result. Some participants were opposed to or ambivalent about learning certain types of results, particularly those having to do with diseases that were incurable or that might have implications for the health of their children.

Conclusion: There was relative enthusiasm about the value of learning sequencing information, yet it was tempered by concern about negative feeling responses and aversion to learning about incurable conditions.

Citing Articles

Research participant perceptions of personal utility in disclosure of individual research results from genomic analysis.

Bogaert B, Crevier M, Roth C, Jox R, Barazzetti G J Community Genet. 2024; 15(5):529-538.

PMID: 39292430 PMC: 11549069. DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00734-7.


Ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) and challenges in the design of a randomized controlled trial to test the online return of cancer genetic research results to U.S. Black women.

Wang C, Bertrand K, Trevino-Talbot M, Flynn M, Ruderman M, Cabral H Contemp Clin Trials. 2023; 132:107309.

PMID: 37516165 PMC: 10544717. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107309.


Demographic Characteristics Associated With Perceptions of Personal Utility in Genetic and Genomic Testing: A Systematic Review.

Miller E, Young J, Rao A, Ward-Lev E, Halley M JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(5):e2310367.

PMID: 37145601 PMC: 10163389. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10367.


Participant views on practical considerations for feedback of individual genetic research results: a case study from Botswana.

Ralefala D, Kasule M, Matshabane O, Wonkam A, Matshaba M, de Vries J Glob Bioeth. 2023; 34(1):1-14.

PMID: 37063478 PMC: 10101680. DOI: 10.1080/11287462.2023.2192329.


Great expectations: patients' preferences for clinically significant results from genomic sequencing.

Shickh S, Sebastian A, Clausen M, Mighton C, Elser C, Eisen A Hum Genet. 2023; 142(4):553-562.

PMID: 36943453 PMC: 11249280. DOI: 10.1007/s00439-023-02543-3.


References
1.
Kaufman D, Murphy J, Scott J, Hudson K . Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study. Genet Med. 2008; 10(11):831-9. DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31818bb3ab. View

2.
Ormond K, Wheeler M, Hudgins L, Klein T, Butte A, Altman R . Challenges in the clinical application of whole-genome sequencing. Lancet. 2010; 375(9727):1749-51. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60599-5. View

3.
Murphy J, Scott J, Kaufman D, Geller G, LeRoy L, Hudson K . Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research. Am J Bioeth. 2008; 8(11):36-43. PMC: 2682364. DOI: 10.1080/15265160802513093. View

4.
Berg J, Khoury M, Evans J . Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: meeting the challenge one bin at a time. Genet Med. 2011; 13(6):499-504. DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318220aaba. View

5.
Drmanac R . The advent of personal genome sequencing. Genet Med. 2011; 13(3):188-90. DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31820f16e6. View