» Articles » PMID: 24308883

Digesting the Doughnut Hole

Overview
Journal J Health Econ
Specialty Health Services
Date 2013 Dec 7
PMID 24308883
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite its success, Medicare Part D has been widely criticized for the gap in coverage, the so-called "doughnut hole". We compare the use of prescription drugs among beneficiaries subject to the coverage gap with usage among beneficiaries who are not exposed to it. We find that the coverage gap does, indeed, disrupt the use of prescription drugs among seniors with diabetes. But the declines in usage are modest and concentrated among higher cost, brand-name medications. Demand for high cost medications such as antipsychotics, antiasthmatics, and drugs of the central nervous system decline by 8-18% in the coverage gap, while use of lower cost medications with high generic penetration such as beta blockers, ACE inhibitors and antidepressants decline by 3-5% after reaching the gap. More importantly, lower adherence to medications is not associated with increases in medical service use.

Citing Articles

Do High-Deductible Health Plans Incentivize Changing the Timing of Substance Use Disorder Treatment?.

Hollander M, Kennedy-Hendricks A, Schilling C, Meiselbach M, Stuart E, Huskamp H Med Care Res Rev. 2023; 80(5):530-539.

PMID: 37345300 PMC: 10961140. DOI: 10.1177/10775587231180667.


Effects of Medicare Part D coverage gap closure on utilization of branded and generic drugs.

Liu J, Zhang Y, Kaplan C Health Econ. 2022; 32(3):639-653.

PMID: 36399360 PMC: 9898097. DOI: 10.1002/hec.4637.


Financial hardship from purchasing prescription drugs among older adults in the United States before, during, and after the Medicare Part D "Donut Hole": Findings from 1998, 2001, 2015, and 2021.

Olson A, Schommer J, Mott D, Adekunle O, Brown L J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022; 28(5):508-517.

PMID: 35471065 PMC: 10373028. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.5.508.


Decreased Antihyperglycemic Drug Use Driven by High Out-of-Pocket Costs Despite Medicare Coverage Gap Closure.

Gokhale M, Dusetzina S, Pate V, Chun D, Buse J, Sturmer T Diabetes Care. 2020; 43(9):2121-2127.

PMID: 32641378 PMC: 7440898. DOI: 10.2337/dc19-1880.


Private provision of social insurance: drug-specific price elasticities and cost sharing in Medicare Part D.

Einav L, Finkelstein A, Polyakova M Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2018; 10(3):122-153.

PMID: 30233766 PMC: 6141206. DOI: 10.1257/pol.20160355.


References
1.
Yin W, Basu A, Zhang J, Rabbani A, Meltzer D, Alexander G . The effect of the Medicare Part D prescription benefit on drug utilization and expenditures. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 148(3):169-77. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-3-200802050-00200. View

2.
Zhang Y, Donohue J, Newhouse J, Lave J . The effects of the coverage gap on drug spending: a closer look at Medicare Part D. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009; 28(2):w317-25. PMC: 2859617. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.w317. View

3.
Motheral B, Fairman K . Effect of a three-tier prescription copay on pharmaceutical and other medical utilization. Med Care. 2001; 39(12):1293-304. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200112000-00005. View

4.
Hsu J, Price M, Huang J, Brand R, Fung V, Hui R . Unintended consequences of caps on Medicare drug benefits. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(22):2349-59. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa054436. View

5.
Fairman K, Motheral B, Henderson R . Retrospective, long-term follow-up study of the effect of a three-tier prescription drug copayment system on pharmaceutical and other medical utilization and costs. Clin Ther. 2004; 25(12):3147-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)90099-3. View