» Articles » PMID: 24307348

A Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate G-CSF Usage in Patients with Solid Tumors Receiving Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy in Italian Clinical Oncology Practice

Overview
Journal Med Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2013 Dec 6
PMID 24307348
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a severe dose-limiting side effect of myelosuppressive chemotherapy in patients with solid tumors. Clinical practice guidelines recommend primary prophylaxis with G-CSF in patients with an overall ≥ 20 % risk of FN. AIOM Italian guidelines recommend starting G-CSF within 24-72 h after chemotherapy; for daily G-CSF, administration should continue until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) is 1 × 10(9)/L post-nadir and should not be terminated after ANC increase in the early days of administration. The aim of this study was to assess guideline adherence in oncology practice in Italy. In this multicenter, prospective, observational study, patients were enrolled at the first G-CSF use in any cycle and were followed for two subsequent cycles (or until the end of chemotherapy if less than two additional cycles). Primary objective was to explore G-CSF use in Italian clinical practice; therefore, data were collected on the G-CSF type, timing of administration, and number of doses. 512 eligible patients were enrolled (median age, 62). The most common tumor types were breast (36 %), lung (18 %), and colorectal (13 %). A total of 1,164 G-CSF cycles (daily G-CSF, 718; pegfilgrastim, 446) were observed. Daily G-CSF was administered later than 72 h after chemotherapy in 42 % of cycles, and the median [range] number of doses was four [1, 10]. Pegfilgrastim was administered later than 72 h in 8 % of cycles. G-CSF prophylaxis in Italy is frequently administered in a manner which is not supported by evidence-based guidelines. As this practice may lead to poor outcomes, educational initiatives are recommended.

Citing Articles

Supportive therapies in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and appropriate use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: a Delphi consensus statement.

Adamo V, Antonuzzo L, Danova M, De Laurentiis M, Marchetti P, Pinto C Support Care Cancer. 2022; 30(12):9877-9888.

PMID: 36334157 PMC: 9715510. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07430-7.


Filgrastim prophylaxis in elderly cancer patients in the real-life setting: a French multicenter observational study, the TULIP study.

Laribi K, Badinand D, Janoray P, Benabed K, Mouysset J, Fabre E Support Care Cancer. 2019; 27(11):4283-4292.

PMID: 30874925 PMC: 6803566. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04725-0.


Biosimilar filgrastim treatment patterns and prevention of febrile neutropenia: a prospective multicentre study in France in patients with solid tumours (the ZOHé study).

Roche H, Eymard J, Radji A, Prevost A, Diab R, Lamuraglia M BMC Cancer. 2018; 18(1):1127.

PMID: 30445935 PMC: 6240200. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4986-1.


Overuse and underuse of pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia.

Zullo A, Lou U, Cabral S, Huynh J, Berard-Collins C J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2018; 25(6):1357-1365.

PMID: 30124123 PMC: 8915199. DOI: 10.1177/1078155218792698.


Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of neutrophil response to G-CSF in healthy subjects and patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Melhem M, Delor I, Perez-Ruixo J, Harrold J, Chow A, Wu L Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018; 84(5):911-925.

PMID: 29318653 PMC: 5903247. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13504.


References
1.
Crawford J, Caserta C, Roila F . Hematopoietic growth factors: ESMO recommendations for the applications. Ann Oncol. 2009; 20 Suppl 4:162-5. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdp162. View

2.
Kuderer N, Dale D, Crawford J, Lyman G . Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(21):3158-67. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.8823. View

3.
Lyman G . Guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network on the use of myeloid growth factors with cancer chemotherapy: a review of the evidence. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2005; 3(4):557-71. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2005.0031. View

4.
Smith T, Khatcheressian J, Lyman G, Ozer H, Armitage J, Balducci L . 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(19):3187-205. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.4451. View

5.
Koumakis G, Vassilomanolakis M, Barbounis V, Hatzichristou E, Demiri S, Plataniotis G . Optimal timing (Preemptive versus supportive) of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration following high-dose cyclophosphamide. Oncology. 1999; 56(1):28-35. DOI: 10.1159/000011926. View