» Articles » PMID: 24307067

Elderly Patients Have Similar Outcomes Compared to Younger Patients After Minimally Invasive Surgery for Spinal Stenosis

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2013 Dec 6
PMID 24307067
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Older patients undergo surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in great numbers, but as a result of substantial diagnostic and surgical heterogeneity, the impact of age on results after surgery is poorly defined.

Questions/purposes: We compared groups of patients younger and older than 70 years with relative clinical and surgical homogeneity to determine differences in (1) interval improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively and (2) perioperative adverse events.

Methods: We performed a subgroup analysis of an ongoing prospective observational study. Patients were divided based primarily on age (younger than 70 years [n = 68] and 70 years or older [n = 41]) and secondarily on procedure (minimally invasive decompression alone or decompression and instrumented fusion). With the exception of age and American Society of Anesthesiologists status, the two age groups were similar (p > 0.3) in baseline demographics and ODI. Mean pre- and postoperative ODI were compared between groups at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. Perioperative adverse events were also compared.

Results: At all time intervals, both younger and older patients demonstrated (p = 0.05 to < 0.001) improvements in ODI. At the 1-year mark, no differences in ODI were demonstrated between the younger and older patients for decompression only (21 versus 26 [p = 0.29]) or decompression and fusion (19 versus 18 [p = 0.97]). Interval improvement in ODI was not different between younger and older patients at any time point for decompression only (6 weeks: -18 versus -20 [p = 0.66]; 6 months: -21 versus -17 [p = 0.41]; 12 months: -21 versus -15 [p = 0.29]) or decompression and fusion (6 weeks: -11 versus -12 [p = 0.58]; 6 months: -21 versus -22 [p = 0.69]; 12 months: -23 versus -27 [p = 0.97]). There were no differences in perioperative adverse events between groups (p = 0.67).

Conclusions: When clinical and surgical heterogeneity is minimized, improvements in terms of disability as measured by the ODI and the frequency of adverse events after surgery in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis are comparable to those of younger patients. For patients with focal lumbar spinal stenosis, age alone should not dissuade us from considering surgical intervention if otherwise indicated.

Level Of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Citing Articles

Open laminectomy vs. minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a review.

Dhar U, Menzer E, Lin M, OConnor T, Ghimire N, Dakwar E Front Surg. 2024; 11:1357897.

PMID: 39575449 PMC: 11578987. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1357897.


Impact of age on comparative outcomes of decompression alone versus fusion for L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Shahi P, Singh S, Morse K, Maayan O, Subramanian T, Araghi K Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(10):3749-3759.

PMID: 38907067 PMC: 11780706. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08336-0.


Long-Term Results of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Elderly Patients: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study.

Goh G, Tay A, Zeng G, Soh R Global Spine J. 2023; 15(2):838-845.

PMID: 37942769 PMC: 11877569. DOI: 10.1177/21925682231214067.


Influence of the geometric and material properties of lumbar endplate on lumbar interbody fusion failure: a systematic review.

Yu Y, Robinson D, Ackland D, Yang Y, Lee P J Orthop Surg Res. 2022; 17(1):224.

PMID: 35399075 PMC: 8996478. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03091-8.


Age-related Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Lumbar Discectomy.

Behrbalk E, Uri O, Masarwa R, Alfandari L, Fatal S, Folman Y Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2022; 12:21514593211066732.

PMID: 34992895 PMC: 8724981. DOI: 10.1177/21514593211066732.


References
1.
Fujita T, Kostuik J, Huckell C, Sieber A . Complications of spinal fusion in adult patients more than 60 years of age. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998; 29(4):669-78. DOI: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70040-7. View

2.
Oldridge N, Yuan Z, STOLL J, Rimm A . Lumbar spine surgery and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries, 1986. Am J Public Health. 1994; 84(8):1292-8. PMC: 1615452. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.84.8.1292. View

3.
Suri P, Rainville J, Kalichman L, Katz J . Does this older adult with lower extremity pain have the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis?. JAMA. 2010; 304(23):2628-36. PMC: 3260477. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1833. View

4.
Weinstein J, Lurie J, Tosteson T, Hanscom B, Tosteson A, Blood E . Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(22):2257-70. PMC: 2553804. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa070302. View

5.
Ragab A, Fye M, Bohlman H . Surgery of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis in 118 patients 70 years of age or older. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(4):348-53. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000048494.66599.DF. View