» Articles » PMID: 24301541

Significance of Saguaro Cactus Alkaloids in Ecology OfDrosophila Mettleri, a Soil-breeding, Cactophilic Drosophilid

Overview
Journal J Chem Ecol
Publisher Springer
Date 2013 Dec 5
PMID 24301541
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Drosophila mettleri is a soil-breeding, cactophilic drosophilid which lives in the Sonoran Desert. Several chemical constituents of cacti in this region have been identified as having major roles in insect-host plant relationships involvingDrosophila. For example, isoquinoline alkaloids, which are present in senita cactus, have been shown to be toxic to seven of the nine species tested. The two tolerant species areD. pachea, the normal resident, andD. mettleri. Necroses of senita cacti are often used as feeding substrates byD. mettleri adults, but this species has never been reared from senita rots. Soil, which have been soaked by juice from saguaro and cardón rots, are the typical breeding substrates of this species. The tissues of both of these cacti also contain alkaloids, chemically related to those in senita, but at much lower concentrations. Alkaloid concentration in saguaro-soaked soil was found to be 1.4-27 times the average concentration in fresh tissue. Alkaloids were extracted from saguaro tissue and used in tests of larva-to-adult viability, developmental rate, and adult longevity. Elevated concentrations of saguaro alkaloids had no significant effect on the longevity ofD. mettleri, but significantly reduced the longevity ofD. nigrospiracula andD. mojavensis, two nonsoil breeding cactophilic species. Viability and developmental rates of all three species were affected, but the effect onD. nigrospiracula was comparatively greater. It is argued that the adaptations that allowD. mettleri to utilize the saguaro soil niche also convey tolerance to alkaloids present in senita tissue. The ability to utilize senita necroses as feeding substrates represents an ecological advantage to D. mettleri, in that the density of potential feeding sites is increased as compared to species which are more specific in their host-plant relationships.

Citing Articles

Differences in tolerance to host cactus alkaloids in Drosophila koepferae and D. buzzatii.

Soto I, Carreira V, Corio C, Padro J, Soto E, Hasson E PLoS One. 2014; 9(2):e88370.

PMID: 24520377 PMC: 3919786. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088370.


Comparison of larval and adult P-450 activity levels for alkaloid metabolism in desertDrosophila.

Danielson P, Frank M, Fogleman J J Chem Ecol. 2013; 20(8):1893-906.

PMID: 24242717 DOI: 10.1007/BF02066231.


Host plant adaptation in Drosophila mettleri populations.

Castrezana S, Bono J PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e34008.

PMID: 22493678 PMC: 3320901. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034008.


Molecular evolution and population genetics of two Drosophila mettleri cytochrome P450 genes involved in host plant utilization.

Bono J, Matzkin L, Castrezana S, Markow T Mol Ecol. 2008; 17(13):3211-21.

PMID: 18510584 PMC: 2702709. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03823.x.


Molecular cloning of a family of xenobiotic-inducible drosophilid cytochrome p450s: evidence for involvement in host-plant allelochemical resistance.

Danielson P, Macintyre R, Fogleman J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94(20):10797-802.

PMID: 9380713 PMC: 23490. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.20.10797.

References
1.
Hallstrom I, Grafstrom R . the metabolism of drugs and carcinogens in isolated subcellular fractions of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Enzyme induction and metabolism of benzo[a]pyrene. Chem Biol Interact. 1981; 34(2):145-59. DOI: 10.1016/0009-2797(81)90127-7. View

2.
Baars A, Blijleven W, Mohn G, Natarajan A, Breimer D . Preliminary studies on the ability of Drosophila microsomal preparations to activate mutagens and carcinogens. Mutat Res. 1980; 72(2):257-64. DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(80)90040-8. View

3.
Zijlstra J, Vogel E, Breimer D . Strain-differences and inducibility of microsomal oxidative enzymes in Drosophila melanogaster flies. Chem Biol Interact. 1984; 48(3):317-38. DOI: 10.1016/0009-2797(84)90143-1. View

4.
Fogleman J, Duperret S, Kircher H . The role of phytosterols in host plant utilization by cactophilicDrosophila. Lipids. 2016; 21(1):92-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF02534309. View

5.
Brattsten L, WILKINSON C, Eisner T . Herbivore-plant interactions: mixed-function oxidases and secondary plant substances. Science. 1977; 196(4296):1349-52. DOI: 10.1126/science.196.4296.1349. View