» Articles » PMID: 24291049

Sample and Data Sharing: Observations from a Central Data Repository

Overview
Journal Clin Biochem
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2013 Dec 3
PMID 24291049
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: From 2003 to 2013, RTI International served as the data repository for the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). RTI worked closely with two sample repository partners to build and maintain the Central Repository (CR) that made data and samples available to approved requestors. In this paper, we recap aspects of establishing the mechanism; detail the challenges and limitations of data and sample sharing, and explore the future of resource sharing in light of the evolving environment of research funding.

Design And Methods: Effective maintenance required the system to be flexible and dynamic while at the same time compliant with established data standards.

Results: Our years serving as the CR for NIDDK have yielded a number of observations about the difficulties of running a repository, an operation that is by definition dependent on many outside parties whose degree of expertise and efficiency have a direct impact on repository functioning.

Conclusion: The bio-banking industry will likely continue to become more globally centralized for studying specific genetic diseases and monitoring the health of our environment. The dynamic relationship between emerging technologies and the infrastructure will be needed to support future research that requires the ability of organizations providing support to remain flexible even while following established standards.

Citing Articles

Cancer oriented biobanks: A comprehensive review.

Patil S, Majumdar B, Awan K, Sarode G, Sarode S, Gadbail A Oncol Rev. 2018; 12(1):357.

PMID: 30057691 PMC: 6047884. DOI: 10.4081/oncol.2018.357.


Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff.

Federer L, Lu Y, Joubert D, Welsh J, Brandys B PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0129506.

PMID: 26107811 PMC: 4481309. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129506.

References
1.
Landy D, Brinich M, Colten M, Horn E, Terry S, Sharp R . How disease advocacy organizations participate in clinical research: a survey of genetic organizations. Genet Med. 2012; 14(2):223-8. DOI: 10.1038/gim.0b013e3182310ba0. View

2.
Manolio T, Weis B, Cowie C, Hoover R, Hudson K, Kramer B . New models for large prospective studies: is there a better way?. Am J Epidemiol. 2012; 175(9):859-66. PMC: 3339313. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr453. View

3.
Wolf S, Crock B, Van Ness B, Lawrenz F, Kahn J, Beskow L . Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets. Genet Med. 2012; 14(4):361-84. PMC: 3597341. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.23. View

4.
Pan H, Ardini M, Bakalov V, DeLatte M, Eggers P, Ganapathi L . 'What's in the NIDDK CDR?'--public query tools for the NIDDK central data repository. Database (Oxford). 2013; 2013:bas058. PMC: 3625049. DOI: 10.1093/database/bas058. View