Parts and Relations in Young Children's Shape-Based Object Recognition

Overview

Journal J Cogn Dev

Publisher Routledge

Date 2013 Nov 29

PMID 24285930

Citations 11

Authors

Elaine Augustine

Linda B Smith

Susan S Jones

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The ability to recognize common objects from sparse information about geometric shape emerges during the same period in which children learn object names and object categories. Hummel and Biederman's (1992) theory of object recognition proposes that the geometric shapes of objects have two components-geometric volumes representing major object parts, and the spatial relations among those parts. In the present research, 18- to 30-month-old children's ability to use separate information about object part shapes and part relations to recognize both novel (Experiment 1) and common objects (Experiment 2) was examined. Children succeeded in matching novel objects on part shapes despite differences in part relations but did not match on part relations when there were differences in part shapes. Given known objects, children showed that they did represent the relational structure of those objects. The results support the proposal that children's representations of the geometric structures of objects are built over time and may require exposure to multiple instances of an object category. More broadly, the results suggest that the distinction between object part shape and part relations as two components of object shape similarity is psychologically real and developmentally significant.

Citing Articles

The developmental trajectory of object recognition robustness: Children are like small adults but unlike big deep neural networks.

Huber L, Geirhos R, Wichmann F J Vis. 2023; 23(7):4.

PMID: 37410494 PMC: 10337805. DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.7.4.

Quantity and Diversity: Simulating Early Word Learning Environments.

Montag J, Jones M, Smith L Cogn Sci. 2018; 42 Suppl 2:375-412.

PMID: 29411899 PMC: 5980672. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12592.

Cultural differences in visual object recognition in 3-year-old children.

Kuwabara M, Smith L J Exp Child Psychol. 2016; 147:22-38.

PMID: 26985576 PMC: 4854758. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.02.006.

Relations among early object recognition skills: Objects and letters.

Augustine E, Jones S, Smith L, Longfield E J Cogn Dev. 2015; 16(2):221-235.

PMID: 25969673 PMC: 4426263. DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2013.815620.

Borgstrom K, von Koss Torkildsen J, Lindgren M Front Psychol. 2015; 6:143.

PMID: 25762957 PMC: 4327527. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00143.

References

Ullman S . Object recognition and segmentation by a fragment-based hierarchy. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006; 11(2):58-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.009. View

Gershkoff-Stowe L, Smith L . Shape and the first hundred nouns. Child Dev. 2004; 75(4):1098-114. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00728.x. View

Doumas L, Hummel J . A computational account of the development of the generalization of shape information. Cogn Sci. 2011; 34(4):698-712. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01103.x. View

Mash C . Multidimensional shape similarity in the development of visual object classification. J Exp Child Psychol. 2006; 95(2):128-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.04.002. View

Peissig J, Tarr M . Visual object recognition: do we know more now than we did 20 years ago?. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006; 58:75-96. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.102904.190114. View

Biederman I . Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol Rev. 1987; 94(2):115-147. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.115. View

Smith L . From Fragments to Geometric Shape: Changes in Visual Object Recognition Between 18 and 24 Months. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2020; 18(5):290-294. PMC: 7265591. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01654.x. View

Rakison D, Butterworth G . Infants' use of object parts in early categorization. Dev Psychol. 1998; 34(1):49-62. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.34.1.49. View

Tek S, Jaffery G, Fein D, Naigles L . Do children with autism spectrum disorders show a shape bias in word learning?. Autism Res. 2009; 1(4):208-22. PMC: 2630708. DOI: 10.1002/aur.38. View

10.

Smith L . Learning to recognize objects. Psychol Sci. 2003; 14(3):244-50. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.03439. View

11.

Graf M . Coordinate transformations in object recognition. Psychol Bull. 2006; 132(6):920-45. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.920. View

12.

Son J, Smith L, Goldstone R . Connecting instances to promote children's relational reasoning. J Exp Child Psychol. 2010; 108(2):260-77. PMC: 2991522. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.011. View

13.

Riesenhuber M, Poggio T . Models of object recognition. Nat Neurosci. 2000; 3 Suppl:1199-204. DOI: 10.1038/81479. View

14.

Son J, Smith L, Goldstone R . Simplicity and generalization: Short-cutting abstraction in children's object categorizations. Cognition. 2008; 108(3):626-38. PMC: 2584368. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.002. View

15.

Graham S, Namy L, Gentner D, Meagher K . The role of comparison in preschoolers' novel object categorization. J Exp Child Psychol. 2010; 107(3):280-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.017. View

16.

Rakison D, Butterworth G . Infants' attention to object structure in early categorization. Dev Psychol. 1998; 34(6):1310-25. DOI: 10.1037//0012-1649.34.6.1310. View

17.

Quinn P . Is the asymmetry in young infants' categorization of humans versus nonhuman animals based on head, body, or global gestalt information?. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004; 11(1):92-7. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206466. View

18.

Smith L, Jones S, Landau B, Gershkoff-Stowe L, Samuelson L . Object name learning provides on-the-job training for attention. Psychol Sci. 2002; 13(1):13-9. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00403. View

19.

Hummel J, Biederman I . Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychol Rev. 1992; 99(3):480-517. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.3.480. View

20.

Poirel N, Mellet E, Houde O, Pineau A . First came the trees, then the forest: developmental changes during childhood in the processing of visual local-global patterns according to the meaningfulness of the stimuli. Dev Psychol. 2008; 44(1):245-53. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.245. View