» Articles » PMID: 24278141

A Generalized Measurement Model to Quantify Health: the Multi-attribute Preference Response Model

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Nov 27
PMID 24278141
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

After 40 years of deriving metric values for health status or health-related quality of life, the effective quantification of subjective health outcomes is still a challenge. Here, two of the best measurement tools, the discrete choice and the Rasch model, are combined to create a new model for deriving health values. First, existing techniques to value health states are briefly discussed followed by a reflection on the recent revival of interest in patients' experience with regard to their possible role in health measurement. Subsequently, three basic principles for valid health measurement are reviewed, namely unidimensionality, interval level, and invariance. In the main section, the basic operation of measurement is then discussed in the framework of probabilistic discrete choice analysis (random utility model) and the psychometric Rasch model. It is then shown how combining the main features of these two models yields an integrated measurement model, called the multi-attribute preference response (MAPR) model, which is introduced here. This new model transforms subjective individual rank data into a metric scale using responses from patients who have experienced certain health states. Its measurement mechanism largely prevents biases such as adaptation and coping. Several extensions of the MAPR model are presented. The MAPR model can be applied to a wide range of research problems. If extended with the self-selection of relevant health domains for the individual patient, this model will be more valid than existing valuation techniques.

Citing Articles

From simple to even simpler, but not too simple: a head-to-head comparison of the Better-Worse and Drop-Down methods for measuring patient health status.

Zhang X, Krabbe P BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023; 23(1):299.

PMID: 38104119 PMC: 10725035. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-02119-9.


Different Frameworks, Similar Results? Head-to-Head Comparison of the Generic Preference-Based Health-Outcome Measures CS-Base and EQ-5D-5L.

Zhang X, Vermeulen K, Krabbe P Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023; 22(2):227-242.

PMID: 37824057 PMC: 10864418. DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00837-1.


The multi-grip and standard myoelectric hand prosthesis compared: does the multi-grip hand live up to its promise?.

Kerver N, Schuurmans V, Van der Sluis C, Bongers R J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023; 20(1):22.

PMID: 36793049 PMC: 9930076. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-023-01131-w.


Economic evaluation of upper limb prostheses in the Netherlands including the cost-effectiveness of multi-grip versus standard myoelectric hand prostheses.

Kerver N, Karssies E, Krabbe P, Van der Sluis C, Groen H Disabil Rehabil. 2022; 45(25):4311-4321.

PMID: 36533430 PMC: 10721225. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2151653.


A two-step procedure to generate utilities for the Infant health-related Quality of life Instrument (IQI).

Krabbe P, Jabrayilov R, Detzel P, Dainelli L, Vermeulen K, van Asselt A PLoS One. 2020; 15(4):e0230852.

PMID: 32243445 PMC: 7122817. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230852.


References
1.
Salomon J, Vos T, Hogan D, Gagnon M, Naghavi M, Mokdad A . Common values in assessing health outcomes from disease and injury: disability weights measurement study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012; 380(9859):2129-43. PMC: 10782811. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61680-8. View

2.
Revicki D, Cella D . Health status assessment for the twenty-first century: item response theory, item banking and computer adaptive testing. Qual Life Res. 1997; 6(6):595-600. DOI: 10.1023/a:1018420418455. View

3.
Hickey A, Bury G, OBoyle C, Bradley F, OKelly F, Shannon W . A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS. BMJ. 1996; 313(7048):29-33. PMC: 2351443. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7048.29. View

4.
Krabbe P, Salomon J, Murray C . Quantification of health states with rank-based nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Med Decis Making. 2007; 27(4):395-405. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07302131. View

5.
Rasch G . An item analysis which takes individual differences into account. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1966; 19(1):49-57. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1966.tb00354.x. View