First Step in Developing a 3D Biodegradable Fibrin Scaffold for an Artificial Ovary
Overview
Reproductive Medicine
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Although transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue is a promising approach to restore fertility in cancer patients, it is not advisable for women at risk of ovarian involvement due to the threat of reintroducing malignant cells. The aim of this study was therefore to find an alternative for these patients by development of an artificial ovary.
Methods: For construction of the artificial ovary matrix, we used a central composite design to investigate nine combinations of fibrinogen (mg/ml) and thrombin (IU/mL) (F/T): F1/T4, F12.5/T1, F12.5/T20, F25/T0.1, F25/T4, F25/T500, F50/T1, F50/T20 and F100/T4. From the first qualitative analyses (handling and matrix size), five combinations (F12.5/T1, F25/T4, F50/T20, F50/T1 and F100/T4) yielded positive results. They were further evaluated in order to assess fibrin matrix degradation and homogeneous cell encapsulation (density), survival and proliferation (Ki67), and atresia (TUNEL) before and after 7 days of in vitro culture. To determine the best compromise between maximizing the dynamic density (Y1) and minimizing the apoptosis rate (Y2), we used the desirability function approach.
Results: Two combinations (F12.5/T1 and F25/T4) showed greater distribution of cells before in vitro culture, reproducible degradation of the fibrin network and adequate support for isolated human ovarian stromal cells, with a high proportion of Ki67-positive cells. SEM analysis revealed a network of fibers with regular pores and healthy stromal cells after in vitro culture with both F/T combinations.
Conclusion: This study reports two optimal F/T combinations that allow survival and proliferation of isolated human ovarian cells. Further studies are required to determine if such a scaffold will also be a suitable environment for isolated ovarian follicles.
Zaniker E, Hashim P, Gauthier S, Ankrum J, Campo H, Duncan F Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(7).
PMID: 39061801 PMC: 11274170. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11070719.
Almeida G, da Silva-Junior L, Gibin M, Dos Santos H, Horvath-Pereira B, Pinho L Cells. 2023; 12(14).
PMID: 37508528 PMC: 10378497. DOI: 10.3390/cells12141864.
Dadashzadeh A, Moghassemi S, Peaucelle A, Lucci C, Amorim C Hum Reprod Open. 2023; 2023(2):hoad004.
PMID: 37009395 PMC: 10053646. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoad004.
Design and Application Strategies of Natural Polymer Biomaterials in Artificial Ovaries.
Peng X, Cheng C, Zhang X, He X, Liu Y Ann Biomed Eng. 2023; 51(3):461-478.
PMID: 36629950 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-022-03125-6.
An Update on In Vitro Folliculogenesis: A New Technique for Post-Cancer Fertility.
Labrune E, Salle B, Lornage J Biomedicines. 2022; 10(9).
PMID: 36140316 PMC: 9496077. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10092217.