» Articles » PMID: 24270055

Exploration and Confirmation of Factors Associated with Uncomplicated Pregnancy in Nulliparous Women: Prospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2013 Nov 26
PMID 24270055
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To identify factors at 15 and 20 weeks' gestation associated with a subsequent uncomplicated pregnancy.

Design: Prospective international multicentre observational cohort study.

Setting: Auckland, New Zealand and Adelaide, Australia (exploration and local replication dataset) and Manchester, Leeds, and London, United Kingdom, and Cork, Republic of Ireland (external confirmation dataset).

Participants: 5628 healthy nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy.

Main Outcome Measure: Uncomplicated pregnancy, defined as a normotensive pregnancy delivered at >37 weeks' gestation, resulting in a liveborn baby not small for gestational age, and the absence of any other significant pregnancy complications. In a stepwise logistic regression the comparison group was women with a complicated pregnancy.

Results: Of the 5628 women, 3452 (61.3%) had an uncomplicated pregnancy. Factors that reduced the likelihood of an uncomplicated pregnancy included increased body mass index (relative risk 0.74, 95% confidence intervals 0.65 to 0.84), misuse of drugs in the first trimester (0.90, 0.84 to 0.97), mean diastolic blood pressure (for each 5 mm Hg increase 0.92, 0.91 to 0.94), and mean systolic blood pressure (for each 5 mm Hg increase 0.95, 0.94 to 0.96). Beneficial factors were prepregnancy fruit intake at least three times daily (1.09, 1.01 to 1.18) and being in paid employment (per eight hours' increase 1.02, 1.01 to 1.04). Detrimental factors not amenable to alteration were a history of hypertension while using oral contraception, socioeconomic index, family history of any hypertensive complications in pregnancy, vaginal bleeding during pregnancy, and increasing uterine artery resistance index. Smoking in pregnancy was noted to be a detrimental factor in the initial two datasets but did not remain in the final model.

Conclusions: This study identified factors associated with normal pregnancy through adoption of a novel hypothesis generating approach, which has shifted the emphasis away from adverse outcomes towards uncomplicated pregnancies. Although confirmation in other cohorts is necessary, this study implies that individually targeted lifestyle interventions (normalising maternal weight, increasing prepregnancy fruit intake, reducing blood pressure, stopping misuse of drugs) may increase the likelihood of normal pregnancy outcomes.

Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12607000551493.

Citing Articles

The association between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2023.

Zhao M, Chang H, Yue Y, Zeng X, Wu S, Ren X Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 12:1526406.

PMID: 39906598 PMC: 11790436. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1526406.


Impact of anthro-metabolic indices and gestational weight gain on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a prospective observational study.

Keles E, Kaya L, Yaksi N, Kaya Z, Tosun O Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024; 70(4):e20231101.

PMID: 38537008 PMC: 10962266. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20231101.


Study of How Adiposity in Pregnancy has an Effect on outcomeS (SHAPES): protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Heslehurst N, Vinogradov R, Nguyen G, Bigirumurame T, Teare D, Hayes L BMJ Open. 2023; 13(9):e073545.

PMID: 37699635 PMC: 10503385. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073545.


Differential effects of diet and physical activity interventions in pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes mellitus and reduce gestational weight gain by level of maternal adiposity: a protocol for an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis....

Boath A, Vale L, Hayes L, Allotey J, Heslehurst N BMJ Open. 2023; 13(3):e065335.

PMID: 36940942 PMC: 10030495. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065335.


US county-level prevalence and spatial distribution of optimal birth outcomes 2018-2019.

Dyer L, Bell C, Perez S, Crear-Perry J, Theall K, Wallace M Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):16535.

PMID: 36192415 PMC: 9529881. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20517-9.


References
1.
Huber M, Knottnerus J, Green L, van der Horst H, Jadad A, Kromhout D . How should we define health?. BMJ. 2011; 343:d4163. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d4163. View

2.
Conover E, Jones K . Safety concerns regarding binge drinking in pregnancy: a review. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012; 94(8):570-5. DOI: 10.1002/bdra.23034. View

3.
Mikkelsen T, Osler M, Orozova-Bekkevold I, Knudsen V, Olsen S . Association between fruit and vegetable consumption and birth weight: a prospective study among 43,585 Danish women. Scand J Public Health. 2006; 34(6):616-22. DOI: 10.1080/14034940600717688. View

4.
Mikkelsen T, Osterdal M, Knudsen V, Haugen M, Meltzer H, Bakketeig L . Association between a Mediterranean-type diet and risk of preterm birth among Danish women: a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87(3):325-30. DOI: 10.1080/00016340801899347. View

5.
Shaikh H, Robinson S, Teoh T . Management of maternal obesity prior to and during pregnancy. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009; 15(2):77-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2009.10.003. View