Sperm Storage Mediated by Cryptic Female Choice for Nuptial Gifts

Overview

Journal Proc Biol Sci

Specialty Biology

Date 2013 Nov 23

PMID 24266042

Citations 12

Authors

Maria J Albo

Trine Bilde

Gabriele Uhl

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Polyandrous females are expected to discriminate among males through postcopulatory cryptic mate choice. Yet, there is surprisingly little unequivocal evidence for female-mediated cryptic sperm choice. In species in which nuptial gifts facilitate mating, females may gain indirect benefits through preferential storage of sperm from gift-giving males if the gift signals male quality. We tested this hypothesis in the spider Pisaura mirabilis by quantifying the number of sperm stored in response to copulation with males with or without a nuptial gift, while experimentally controlling copulation duration. We further assessed the effect of gift presence and copulation duration on egg-hatching success in matings with uninterrupted copulations with gift-giving males. We show that females mated to gift-giving males stored more sperm and experienced 17% higher egg-hatching success, compared with those mated to no-gift males, despite matched copulation durations. Uninterrupted copulations resulted in both increased sperm storage and egg-hatching success. Our study confirms the prediction that the nuptial gift as a male signal is under positive sexual selection by females through cryptic sperm storage. In addition, the gift facilitates longer copulations and increased sperm transfer providing two different types of advantage to gift-giving in males.

Citing Articles

A sexually transmitted sugar orchestrates reproductive responses to nutritional stress.

Kim S, Lee K, Park S, Yang T, Song I, Rai F Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8477.

PMID: 39353950 PMC: 11445483. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52807-3.

Polyandry and sperm competition in two traumatically inseminating species of Strepsiptera (Insecta).

Jandausch K, Wanjura N, Escalona H, Sann M, Beutel R, Pohl H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):10447.

PMID: 38714726 PMC: 11076583. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61109-z.

Intraspecific body size variation and allometry of genitalia in the orb-web spider-.

Dharmarathne C, McLean D, Herberstein M, Schneider J PeerJ. 2023; 11:e16413.

PMID: 38047024 PMC: 10691382. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16413.

Paternity sharing in insects with female competition for nuptial gifts.

Browne J, Gwynne D Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(11):e9463.

PMID: 36329813 PMC: 9618826. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9463.

Effects of reliance on stored sperm on reproduction in the sailfin molly Poecilia latipinna.

Hankison S, Gangloff E, Fry B, Arnold A, Lashway A, Betts J J Fish Biol. 2022; 101(6):1628-1633.

PMID: 36134581 PMC: 10091790. DOI: 10.1111/jfb.15228.

References

Eberhard W . EVIDENCE FOR WIDESPREAD COURTSHIP DURING COPULATION IN 131 SPECIES OF INSECTS AND SPIDERS, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CRYPTIC FEMALE CHOICE. Evolution. 2017; 48(3):711-733. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01356.x. View

Vocking O, Uhl G, Michalik P . Sperm dynamics in spiders (Araneae): ultrastructural analysis of the sperm activation process in the garden spider Argiope bruennichi (Scopoli, 1772). PLoS One. 2013; 8(9):e72660. PMC: 3765205. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072660. View

Demary K, Lewis S . Male courtship attractiveness and paternity success in Photinus greeni fireflies. Evolution. 2007; 61(2):431-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00033.x. View

Edvardsson M, Arnqvist G . Copulatory courtship and cryptic female choice in red flour beetles Tribolium castaneum. Proc Biol Sci. 2000; 267(1443):559-63. PMC: 1690577. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1037. View

Schneider J, Lesmono K . Courtship raises male fertilization success through post-mating sexual selection in a spider. Proc Biol Sci. 2009; 276(1670):3105-11. PMC: 2817132. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0694. View

LeBas N, Hockham L . An invasion of cheats; the evolution of worthless nuptial gifts. Curr Biol. 2005; 15(1):64-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.043. View

Prokop P, Maxwell M . Female feeding regime and polyandry in the nuptially feeding nursery web spider, Pisaura mirabilis. Naturwissenschaften. 2008; 96(2):259-65. DOI: 10.1007/s00114-008-0477-6. View

Bilde T, Friberg U, Maklakov A, Fry J, Arnqvist G . The genetic architecture of fitness in a seed beetle: assessing the potential for indirect genetic benefits of female choice. BMC Evol Biol. 2008; 8:295. PMC: 2596129. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-295. View

Pitnick S, Spicer G, Markow T . How long is a giant sperm?. Nature. 1995; 375(6527):109. DOI: 10.1038/375109a0. View

10.

Gwynne D . Sexual conflict over nuptial gifts in insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 2007; 53:83-101. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093423. View

11.

Tallamy D, Darlington M, Pesek J, Powell B . Copulatory courtship signals male genetic quality in cucumber beetles. Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 270(1510):77-82. PMC: 1691205. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2198. View

12.

Zahavi A . Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol. 1975; 53(1):205-14. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3. View

13.

Peretti A, Eberhard W . Cryptic female choice via sperm dumping favours male copulatory courtship in a spider. J Evol Biol. 2010; 23(2):271-81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01900.x. View

14.

Tuni C, Albo M, Bilde T . Polyandrous females acquire indirect benefits in a nuptial feeding species. J Evol Biol. 2013; 26(6):1307-16. DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12137. View

15.

Bretman A, Newcombe D, Tregenza T . Promiscuous females avoid inbreeding by controlling sperm storage. Mol Ecol. 2009; 18(16):3340-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04301.x. View

16.

Albo M, Winther G, Tuni C, Toft S, Bilde T . Worthless donations: male deception and female counter play in a nuptial gift-giving spider. BMC Evol Biol. 2011; 11:329. PMC: 3228764. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-329. View

17.

Sakaluk S . Male crickets feed females to ensure complete sperm transfer. Science. 1984; 223(4636):609-10. DOI: 10.1126/science.223.4636.609. View

18.

Kvarnemo C, Simmons L . Polyandry as a mediator of sexual selection before and after mating. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013; 368(1613):20120042. PMC: 3576577. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0042. View

19.

Fedina T . Cryptic female choice during spermatophore transfer in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J Insect Physiol. 2006; 53(1):93-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2006.10.011. View

20.

Pizzari T, Birkhead T . Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males. Nature. 2000; 405(6788):787-9. DOI: 10.1038/35015558. View