Effects of Easy-to-perform Procedures to Reduce Bacterial Colonization with Streptococcus Mutans and Staphylococcus Aureus on Toothbrushes
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
It is well known that dental caries and periodontitis are the consequence of bacterial colonization and biofilm formation on the enamel surface. The continuous presence of bacterial biofilms on the tooth surface results in demineralization of the tooth enamel and induces an inflammatory reaction of the surrounding gums (gingivitis). The retention and survival of microorganisms on toothbrushes pose a threat of recontamination especially for certain patients at risk for systemic infections originating from the oral cavity, e.g., after T-cell depleted bone marrow transplantation. Thus, the effects of different decolonization schemes on bacterial colonization of toothbrushes were analyzed, in order to demonstrate their applicability to reduce the likelihood of (auto-)reinfections. Toothbrushes were intentionally contaminated with standardized suspensions of Streptococcus mutans or Staphylococcus aureus. Afterwards, the toothbrushes were exposed to rinsing under distilled water, rinsing and drying for 24 h, 0.2% chlorhexidine-based decolonization, or ultraviolet (UV) radiation. The remaining colony forming units were compared with freshly contaminated positive controls. Each experiment was nine-fold repeated. Bi-factorial variance analysis was performed; significance was accepted at P < 0.05. All tested procedures led to a significant reduction of bacteral colonization irrespective of the toothbrush model, the brush head type, or the acitivity state. Chlorhexidine-based decolonization was shown to be superior to rinsing and slightly superior to rinsing and drying for 24 h, while UV radiation was similarly effective as chlorhexidine. UV radiation was slightly less prone to species-dependent limitations of its decolonizing effects by bristle thickness of toothbrushes than chlorhexidin. Reduction of bacterial colonization of toothbrushes might reduce the risk of maintaining bacterial infections of the upper respiratory tract. Accordingly, respective procedures are advisable, particularly as they are cheap and easy to perform.
Jahan F, Chinni S, Samuggam S, Veeranjaneya Reddy L, Solayappan M, Yin L Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(12).
PMID: 35742906 PMC: 9223757. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23126462.
Antimicrobial Efficacy of Charcoal vs. Non-charcoal Toothbrushes: A Randomized Controlled Study.
AlDhawi R, Alnaqa N, Tashkandi O, Gamal A, AlShammery H, Eltom S J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2021; 10(6):719-723.
PMID: 33437704 PMC: 7791587. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_290_20.
Efficacy of two mouth rinse sprays in inhibiting growth on toothbrush bristles.
Talaat D, Sharaf A, Ghoneim M, El-Shazly S, Meligy O Saudi Dent J. 2018; 30(4):365-372.
PMID: 30202175 PMC: 6128805. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.07.005.
Liu Z, Que F, Liao L, Zhou M, You L, Zhao Q PLoS One. 2014; 9(10):e109808.
PMID: 25299072 PMC: 4192535. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109808.