» Articles » PMID: 24259152

Risk Stratification Using Line Source Attenuation Correction with Rest/stress Tc-99m Sestamibi SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Overview
Journal J Nucl Cardiol
Date 2013 Nov 22
PMID 24259152
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although line source attenuation correction (AC) in SPECT MPI studies improves diagnostic accuracy, its prognostic value is less understood.

Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 6,513) who underwent rest/stress AC ECG-gated SPECT MPI were followed for cardiac death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI). A 17-segment model and AC summed stress score (SSS) were used to classify images.

Results: Of the 6,513 patients, cardiac death or non-fatal MI occurred in 267 (4.1%), over 2.0 ± 1.4 years. The AC-SSS in patients with a cardiac event (5.6 ± 7.8) was significantly higher than in those without (1.9 ± 4.6, P < .001). The annualized cardiac event rate in patients with an AC-SSS 1-3 (3.6%) was significantly higher than in those with an AC-SSS = 0 (1.1%, P < .001) but similar to that in those with an AC-SSS 4-8 (2.9%, P = .4). Accordingly, patients were classified to AC-SSS = 0, 1-8, and >8 with annualized cardiac event rates of 1.1%, 3.2%, and 8.5%, respectively (P < .0001). In multivariate analysis, an AC-SSS 1-8 and >8 emerged as independent predictors of cardiac events (P < .02 and P < .0001, respectively).

Conclusion: Rest/stress ECG-gated SPECT MPI with line source AC provides highly effective and incremental risk stratification for future cardiac events.

Citing Articles

Long-term prognostic value of computed tomography-based attenuation correction on thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging: A cohort study.

Huang J, Yen R, Huang C, Liu C, Cheng M, Chien K PLoS One. 2021; 16(10):e0258983.

PMID: 34699538 PMC: 8547642. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258983.


5-Year Prognostic Value of Quantitative Versus Visual MPI in Subtle Perfusion Defects: Results From REFINE SPECT.

Otaki Y, Betancur J, Sharir T, Hu L, Gransar H, Liang J JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 13(3):774-785.

PMID: 31202740 PMC: 6899217. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.02.028.


Fully automated analysis of attenuation-corrected SPECT for the long-term prediction of acute myocardial infarction.

Motwani M, Leslie W, Goertzen A, Otaki Y, Germano G, Berman D J Nucl Cardiol. 2017; 25(4):1353-1360.

PMID: 28290099 PMC: 5597460. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-0840-0.


Attenuation correction in stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging.

Pazhenkottil A, Kaufmann P, Gaemperli O J Nucl Cardiol. 2016; 24(2):402-404.

PMID: 26829954 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-016-0406-6.


Value of attenuation correction in stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging using CZT-SPECT.

van Dijk J, Mouden M, Ottervanger J, van Dalen J, Knollema S, Slump C J Nucl Cardiol. 2016; 24(2):395-401.

PMID: 26780528 PMC: 5413515. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-015-0374-2.

References
1.
Links J, DePuey E, Taillefer R, Becker L . Attenuation correction and gating synergistically improve the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002; 9(2):183-7. DOI: 10.1067/mnc.2002.120163. View

2.
Tan P, Bailey D, Meikle S, Eberl S, Fulton R, Hutton B . A scanning line source for simultaneous emission and transmission measurements in SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1993; 34(10):1752-60. View

3.
Taneja S, Mohan H, Blake G, Livieratos L, Clarke S . Synergistic impact of attenuation correction and gating in routine myocardial SPECT reporting: 2 year follow-up study. Nucl Med Commun. 2008; 29(4):390-7. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3282f4d374. View

4.
Hachamovitch R, Berman D, Kiat H, Cohen I, Cabico J, Friedman J . Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease: incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification. Circulation. 1996; 93(5):905-14. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.93.5.905. View

5.
Chang S, Nabi F, Xu J, Raza U, Mahmarian J . Normal stress-only versus standard stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging: similar patient mortality with reduced radiation exposure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 55(3):221-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.022. View