» Articles » PMID: 24255599

Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Once Per Cycle Pegfilgrastim and Daily Lenograstim in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy FEC 100: a Pilot Study

Abstract

Background: Neutropenia is a common toxicity in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. In this prospective pilot study, we compared the efficacy and safety profiles of pegfilgrastim administered subcutaneously once per cycle and lenograstim administered subcutaneously daily six times per cycle, for primary neutropenia prophylaxis in women with breast cancer receiving adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

Materials And Methods: Twenty women were enrolled. All patients received epirubicin 100 mg/m(2) with 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 and every 21 days thereafter, according to the FEC 100 chemotherapy regimen. Eight patients received a single dose of pegfilgrastim on day 2, while 12 patients were treated with daily administration of lenograstim from days five to ten. Absolute neutrophil count and duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia were monitored using seriated blood samples. The incidence of bone pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS).

Results: The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was 75% in patients who received pegfilgrastim, and 25% in patients who received lenograstim. One case of febrile neutropenia was shown in pegfilgrastim patients. The mean duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia was 2 days in pegfilgrastim group versus 1.4 days in the lenograstim group. Bone pain was present in 37.5% of pegfilgrastim patients versus 58.3% of lenograstim patients. The mean duration of bone pain in the pegfilgrastim group was 4 days versus 6 days in the lenograstim group.

Conclusion: In our experience, a single injection of pegfilgrastim was less effective for controlling neutropenia than six daily injections of lenograstim. The safety profiles of pegfilgrastim and lenograstim were similar with a lower incidence of bone pain in patients treated with pegfilgrastim.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and Safety of Filgrastim and Its Biosimilars to Prevent Febrile Neutropenia in Cancer Patients: A Prospective Study and Meta-Analysis.

Rastogi S, Kalaiselvan V, Ali S, Ahmad A, Guru S, Sarwat M Biology (Basel). 2021; 10(10).

PMID: 34681169 PMC: 8533340. DOI: 10.3390/biology10101069.


Efficacy and tolerability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in cancer patients after chemotherapy: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Wang Y, Chen L, Liu F, Zhao N, Xu L, Fu B Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):15374.

PMID: 31653961 PMC: 6814815. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51982-4.


Efficacy, safety and proper dose analysis of PEGylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as support for dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy in node positive Chinese breast cancer patients.

Zhang F, LingHu R, Zhan X, Li R, Feng F, Gao X Oncotarget. 2017; 8(45):80020-80028.

PMID: 29108384 PMC: 5668117. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18145.


Comparison of toxicity profile and tolerability between two standard of care paclitaxel-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer.

Alsharedi M, Gress T, Dotson J, Elmsherghi N, Tirona M Med Oncol. 2016; 33(3):27.

PMID: 26883934 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-016-0740-1.


Pegfilgrastim administration after 24 or 72 or 96 h to allow dose-dense anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a single-center experience within the GIM2 randomized phase III trial.

Lambertini M, Bruzzi P, Poggio F, Pastorino S, Gardin G, Clavarezza M Support Care Cancer. 2015; 24(3):1285-94.

PMID: 26306520 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-2907-2.


References
1.
Hao Y, Chen J, Wang X, Zhu H, Rong Z . Effects of site-specific polyethylene glycol modification of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on its biologic activities. BioDrugs. 2006; 20(6):357-62. DOI: 10.2165/00063030-200620060-00006. View

2.
Kuderer N, Dale D, Crawford J, Lyman G . Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(21):3158-67. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.8823. View

3.
Smith T, Khatcheressian J, Lyman G, Ozer H, Armitage J, Balducci L . 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(19):3187-205. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.4451. View

4.
Papaldo P, Lopez M, Marolla P, Cortesi E, Antimi M, Terzoli E . Impact of five prophylactic filgrastim schedules on hematologic toxicity in early breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(28):6908-18. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.099. View

5.
Kubista E, Glaspy J, Holmes F, Green M, Hackett J, Neumann T . Bone pain associated with once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim is similar to daily filgrastim in patients with breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2003; 3(6):391-8. DOI: 10.3816/cbc.2003.n.003. View