» Articles » PMID: 24254431

Occurrence and Particle-size Distributions of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Ambient Air of Coking Plant

Overview
Date 2013 Nov 21
PMID 24254431
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to characterize the occurrence and size distributions of ten species of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the ambient air of coking plants. Particulate-matter samples of four size fractions, including ≤2.1, 2.1-4.2, 4.2-10.2, and ≥10.2 μm, were collected using a Staplex234 cascade impactor during August 2009 at two coking plants in Shanxi, China. The PAHs were analyzed by a gas chromatograph equipped with a mass-selective detector. The concentrations of total particulate-matter PAHs were 1,412.7 and 2,241.1 ng/m(3) for plants I and II, and the distributions showed a peak within the 0.1-2.1 μm size range for plant I and the 0.1-4.2 μm for plant II. The size distributions of individual PAHs (except fluoranthene) exhibited a considerable peak within the 0.1-2.1 μm size range in coking plant I, which can be explained by the gas-particle partition mechanism. The ambient air of the coking plant was heavily polluted by PAHs associated with fine particles (≤2.1 μm), and benzo[b]fluoranthene made the largest contribution to total PAHs. The exposure levels of coking-plant workers to PAHs associated with fine particles were higher than to PAHs associated with coarse particles. Benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[a]pyrene, and dibenzo[a,h]anthracene should be the primary pollutants monitored in the coking plant. This research constitutes a significant contribution to assessing the exposure risk of coking-plant workers and providing basic data for PAH standards for ambient air in coking plants.

Citing Articles

Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter-comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay.

Kovats N, Hubai K, Sainnokhoi T, Hoffer A, Teke G Environ Geochem Health. 2021; 43(11):4367-4378.

PMID: 33864174 PMC: 8528798. DOI: 10.1007/s10653-021-00927-w.

References
1.
Brune H, Grimmer G, Dettbarn G, Misfeld J . Experimental studies in rat lungs on the carcinogenicity and dose-response relationships of eight frequently occurring environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1983; 71(3):539-44. View

2.
Venkataraman C, Friedlander S . Size distributions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and elemental carbon. 2. Ambient measurements and effects of atmospheric processes. Environ Sci Technol. 2011; 28(4):563-72. DOI: 10.1021/es00053a006. View

3.
Kameda Y, Shirai J, Komai T, Nakanishi J, Masunaga S . Atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: size distribution, estimation of their risk and their depositions to the human respiratory tract. Sci Total Environ. 2005; 340(1-3):71-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.08.009. View

4.
Han B, Bai Z, Guo G, Wang F, Li F, Liu Q . Characterization of PM(10) fraction of road dust for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from Anshan, China. J Hazard Mater. 2009; 170(2-3):934-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.059. View

5.
Hoff R, Chan K . Measurement of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the air along the Niagara River. Environ Sci Technol. 2009; 21(6):556-61. DOI: 10.1021/es00160a005. View