» Articles » PMID: 24248341

Effect of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident on the Risk Perception of Residents Near a Nuclear Power Plant in China

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2013 Nov 20
PMID 24248341
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We assessed the influence of the Fukushima nuclear accident (FNA) on the Chinese public's attitude and acceptance of nuclear power plants in China. Two surveys (before and after the FNA) were administered to separate subsamples of residents near the Tianwan nuclear power plant in Lianyungang, China. A structural equation model was constructed to describe the public acceptance of nuclear power and four risk perception factors: knowledge, perceived risk, benefit, and trust. Regression analysis was conducted to estimate the relationship between acceptance of nuclear power and the risk perception factors while controlling for demographic variables. Meanwhile, we assessed the median public acceptable frequencies for three levels of nuclear events. The FNA had a significant impact on risk perception of the Chinese public, especially on the factor of perceived risk, which increased from limited risk to great risk. Public acceptance of nuclear power decreased significantly after the FNA. The most sensitive groups include females, those not in public service, those with lower income, and those living close to the Tianwan nuclear power plant. Fifty percent of the survey respondents considered it acceptable to have a nuclear anomaly no more than once in 50 y. For nuclear incidents and serious incidents, the frequencies are once in 100 y and 150 y, respectively. The change in risk perception and acceptance may be attributed to the FNA. Decreased acceptance of nuclear power after the FNA among the Chinese public creates additional obstacles to further development of nuclear power in China and require effective communication strategies.

Citing Articles

Radiation knowledge and anxiety levels among residents proximity to the world's first AP1000 nuclear power unit.

Guo J, Xuan Z, Lei C, Zheng T, Lai Z, Hao X Front Public Health. 2025; 12:1532278.

PMID: 39877910 PMC: 11772183. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1532278.


The perception of air pollution and its health risk: a scoping review of measures and methods.

Bahrami Z, Sato S, Yang Z, Maiti M, Kanawat P, Umemura T Glob Health Action. 2024; 17(1):2370100.

PMID: 38940815 PMC: 11216274. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2370100.


New observation of perceptive mechanism behind the long-lasting change of people's community mobility: evidence from COVID-19 in China.

Ye Z, Yu Y, Liu Y, Zhang C, Huang L Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):5165.

PMID: 36997595 PMC: 10060925. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32009-5.


Demographic differences in public acceptance of waste-to-energy incinerators in China: High perceived stress group vs. low perceived stress group.

Chen J, He X, Shen Y, Zhao Y, Cui C, Liu Y Front Psychol. 2022; 13:948653.

PMID: 36389485 PMC: 9643326. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948653.


Long-term investigation of environmental radioactivity levels and public health around the Qinshan Nuclear Power Plant, China.

Cao Y, Lin J, Zhai K, Jiang W, Zou H, Ren H Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):4945.

PMID: 35322138 PMC: 8943193. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09091-2.


References
1.
Xie X, Wang M, Xu L . What risks are Chinese people concerned about?. Risk Anal. 2003; 23(4):685-95. DOI: 10.1111/1539-6924.00347. View

2.
Whitfield S, Rosa E, Dan A, Dietz T . The future of nuclear power: value orientations and risk perception. Risk Anal. 2008; 29(3):425-37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01155.x. View

3.
Venables D, Pidgeon N, Simmons P, Henwood K, Parkhill K . Living with nuclear power: A Q-method study of local community perceptions. Risk Anal. 2009; 29(8):1089-104. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01259.x. View

4.
Dohle S, Keller C, Siegrist M . Examining the relationship between affect and implicit associations: implications for risk perception. Risk Anal. 2010; 30(7):1116-28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01404.x. View

5.
Costa-Font J, Rudisill C, Mossialos E . Attitudes as an expression of knowledge and "political anchoring": the case of nuclear power in the United Kingdom. Risk Anal. 2008; 28(5):1273-88. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01094.x. View