» Articles » PMID: 24248007

Associations Between Contrast Sensitivity and Aging

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2013 Nov 20
PMID 24248007
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess age-related visual functions (visual acuity and contrast sensitivity) and compare the results by different age groups.

Material And Methods: A total of 231 patients were examined. The patients were divided into 5 age groups: 10 patients in group 1, 30-39 years; 40 patients in the group 2, 40-49 years; 77 patients in the group 3, 50-59 years; 71 patients in the group 4, 60-70 years; and 33 patients in the group 5, 71-85 years. A typical Snellen's chart (the direction of the gap in Landolt C) was used for noncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity testing. Contrast sensitivity was evaluated by employing a Ginsburg Box, VSCR-CST-6500.

Results: Noncorrected visual acuity was significantly better in the group 2 than the group 3 (0.86 [0.28] vs. 0.69 [0.33], P=0.018). Moreover, noncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity was significantly better in the group 4 than the group 5 (0.52 [0.35] vs. 0.35 [0.28], P<0.001; and 0.9 [0.21] vs. 0.69 [0.27], P<0.005, respectively). Contrast sensitivity at the nighttime without glare was significantly worse in the group 2 than the group 1 at the spatial frequencies of 3, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (P=0.001, P=0.05, and P=0.01, respectively). The patients in the group 2 had significantly worse contrast sensitivity at the nighttime and daytime with glare at the spatial frequencies of 1.5, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (P=0.054, P=0.04, and P=0.01 and P=0.011, P=0.031, and P=0.011, respectively). The greatest differences in contrast sensitivity were observed between the groups 4 and 5, and it was 2 to 4 times better in the group 4. Comparing these groups, all the differences at the nighttime and daytime with and without glare were significant.

Conclusions: Contrast sensitivity was worst among the oldest persons (71-85 years), and it began to worsen already in the persons aged 40-49 years. Contrast sensitivity was very similar in the age groups of 40-49 and 50-59 years.

Citing Articles

Contrast sensitivity before and after refractive error correction among refractive error patients in Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia 2023.

Kebede B, Seid S, Samuel E BMC Ophthalmol. 2025; 25(1):11.

PMID: 39773074 PMC: 11708259. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03817-8.


Binocular function in the aging visual system: fusion, suppression, and stereoacuity.

Song Y, Wang X, Liao M, Baldwin A, Liu L Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1360619.

PMID: 38482141 PMC: 10932981. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1360619.


Alzheimer's disease: a continuum with visual involvements.

Elvira-Hurtado L, Lopez-Cuenca I, de Hoz R, Salas M, Sanchez-Puebla L, Ramirez-Torano F Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1124830.

PMID: 37484098 PMC: 10359162. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124830.


Early visual alterations in individuals at-risk of Alzheimer's disease: a multidisciplinary approach.

Lopez-Cuenca I, Nebreda A, Garcia-Colomo A, Salobrar-Garcia E, de Frutos-Lucas J, Bruna R Alzheimers Res Ther. 2023; 15(1):19.

PMID: 36694201 PMC: 9872347. DOI: 10.1186/s13195-023-01166-0.


Association of genetic variants at CETP, AGER, and CYP4F2 locus with the risk of atrophic age-related macular degeneration.

Liutkeviciene R, Vilkeviciute A, Kriauciuniene L, Banevicius M, Budiene B, Stanislovaitiene D Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020; 8(9):e1357.

PMID: 32666702 PMC: 7507364. DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1357.