» Articles » PMID: 24244511

Temporal Allocation of Foraging Effort in Female Australian Fur Seals (Arctocephalus Pusillus Doriferus)

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Nov 19
PMID 24244511
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Across an individual's life, foraging decisions will be affected by multiple intrinsic and extrinsic drivers that act at differing timescales. This study aimed to assess how female Australian fur seals allocated foraging effort and the behavioural changes used to achieve this at three temporal scales: within a day, across a foraging trip and across the final six months of the lactation period. Foraging effort peaked during daylight hours (57% of time diving) with lulls in activity just prior to and after daylight. Dive duration reduced across the day (196 s to 168 s) but this was compensated for by an increase in the vertical travel rate (1500-1600 m·h(-1)) and a reduction in postdive duration (111-90 s). This suggests physiological constraints (digestive costs) or prey availability may be limiting mean dive durations as a day progresses. During short trips (<2.9 d), effort remained steady at 55% of time diving, whereas, on long trips (>2.9 d) effort increased up to 2-3 d and then decreased. Dive duration decreased at the same rate in short and long trips, respectively, before stabilising (long trips) between 4-5 d. Suggesting that the same processes (digestive costs or prey availability) working at the daily scale may also be present across a trip. Across the lactation period, foraging effort, dive duration and vertical travel rate increased until August, before beginning to decrease. This suggests that as the nutritional demands of the suckling pup and developing foetus increase, female effort increases to accommodate this, providing insight into the potential constraints of maternal investment in this species.

Citing Articles

Estimating reproductive costs in marine mammal bioenergetic models: a review of current knowledge and data availability.

McHuron E, Adamczak S, Costa D, Booth C Conserv Physiol. 2023; 11(1):coac080.

PMID: 36685328 PMC: 9845964. DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coac080.


The cost of a meal: factors influencing prey profitability in Australian fur seals.

Meyers N, Speakman C, Dorville N, Hindell M, Semmens J, Monk J PeerJ. 2021; 9:e12608.

PMID: 34966597 PMC: 8667761. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12608.


Intertrip consistency in hunting behavior improves foraging success and efficiency in a marine top predator.

Speakman C, Lloyd S, Camprasse E, Hoskins A, Hindell M, Costa D Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(9):4428-4441.

PMID: 33976820 PMC: 8093728. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7337.


Factors affecting energy expenditure in a declining fur seal population.

McHuron E, Sterling J, Costa D, Goebel M Conserv Physiol. 2020; 7(1):coz103.

PMID: 31890212 PMC: 6933311. DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coz103.


Dive behaviour and foraging effort of female Cape fur seals .

Kirkman S, Costa D, Harrison A, Kotze P, Oosthuizen W, Weise M R Soc Open Sci. 2019; 6(10):191369.

PMID: 31824733 PMC: 6837185. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.191369.


References
1.
Anthony E, Stack M, Kunz T . Night roosting and the nocturnal time budget of the little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus: Effects of reproductive status, prey density, and environmental conditions. Oecologia. 2017; 51(2):151-156. DOI: 10.1007/BF00540593. View

2.
Oftedal O . Use of maternal reserves as a lactation strategy in large mammals. Proc Nutr Soc. 2000; 59(1):99-106. DOI: 10.1017/s0029665100000124. View

3.
Weimerskirch H, Pinaud D, Pawlowski F, Bost C . Does prey capture induce area-restricted search? A fine-scale study using GPS in a marine predator, the wandering albatross. Am Nat. 2007; 170(5):734-43. DOI: 10.1086/522059. View

4.
ROSEN D, Trites A . Heat increment of feeding in Steller sea lions, Eumetopias jubatus. Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol. 1997; 118(3):877-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9629(97)00039-x. View

5.
Rijnsdorp A, Daan S, Dijkstra C . Hunting in the kestrel, Falco tinnunculus, and the adaptive significance of daily habits. Oecologia. 2017; 50(3):391-406. DOI: 10.1007/BF00344982. View