» Articles » PMID: 24242305

Composition of Larval Secretion OfChrysomela Lapponica (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) and Its Dependence on Host Plant

Overview
Journal J Chem Ecol
Publisher Springer
Date 2013 Nov 19
PMID 24242305
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The defensive secretion ofChrysomela lapponica larvae, which is produced by nine pairs of exocrine dorsal glands, has been chemically analyzed. TheC. lapponica larvae were kept in the laboratory on leaves of either birch (Betula pendula), alder (Alnus glutinosa), or willow (Salix fragilis). Larvae developed normally on birch and willow, whereas those on alder died within a few days. GC-MS analyses of the secretion of larvae on birch and willow revealed that the composition of this secretion differs distinctly from the known ones of several otherChrysomela species feeding exclusively on Salicaceae. In the exocrine secretion of larvae on birch, 69 compounds were identified, which included the main components isobutyric acid, 2-methylbutyric acid, and esters of the two. Several of the esters have not been reported previously from nature. The alcoholic components of the esters may be hydrolysis products ofBetula glycosides. Most components of the secretion of larvae feeding on birch were also found in the secretion of larvae feeding on willow. In addition, major amounts of benzoic acid and salicylalcohol were present in the secretion of the larvae feeding on willow.C. lapponica obviously acquires salicylalcohol by hydrolysis of salicin from willow leaves. However, in contrast to otherChrysomela species,C. lapponica larvae oxidize only traces of salicylalcohol to salicylaldehyde. The repellent activity of single authentic compounds of the secretion of larvae feeding on birch and willow, respectively, was tested in laboratory bioassays with ants (Myrmica sabuleti). Biosynthetic pathways to some identified compounds are suggested and discussed under evolutionary and functional aspects.

Citing Articles

Mimicry in viceroy butterflies is dependent on abundance of the model queen butterfly.

Prudic K, Timmermann B, Papaj D, Ritland D, Oliver J Commun Biol. 2019; 2:68.

PMID: 30793046 PMC: 6379391. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-019-0303-z.


Decrease in feeding niche breadth of Melasoma lapponica (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) with increase in pollution.

Zyereva E, Kozlov M, Neuvonen S Oecologia. 2017; 104(3):323-329.

PMID: 28307589 DOI: 10.1007/BF00328368.


transect of Europe: patterns in the most abundant chrysomelid beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) herbivores of willow from Greece to Arctic Norway.

Canty R, Ruzzier E, Cronk Q, Percy D Biodivers Data J. 2016; (4):e10194.

PMID: 27956853 PMC: 5139136. DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.4.e10194.


Strategies of chemical anti-predator defences in leaf beetles: is sequestration of plant toxins less costly than de novo synthesis?.

Zvereva E, Zverev V, Kruglova O, Kozlov M Oecologia. 2016; 183(1):93-106.

PMID: 27718063 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-016-3743-x.


A common theme in extracellular fluids of beetles: extracellular superoxide dismutases crucial for balancing ROS in response to microbial challenge.

Gretscher R, Streicher P, Strauss A, Wielsch N, Stock M, Wang D Sci Rep. 2016; 6:24082.

PMID: 27068683 PMC: 4828634. DOI: 10.1038/srep24082.


References
1.
Pasteels J, Duffey S, Rowell-Rahier M . Toxins in chrysomelid beetles Possible evolutionary sequence from de novo synthesis to derivation from food-plant chemicals. J Chem Ecol. 2013; 16(1):211-22. DOI: 10.1007/BF01021280. View

2.
Palo R . Distribution of birch (Betula SPP.), willow (Salix SPP.), and poplar (Populus SPP.) secondary metabolites and their potential role as chemical defense against herbivores. J Chem Ecol. 2013; 10(3):499-520. DOI: 10.1007/BF00988096. View

3.
Meinwald J, Jones T, Eisner T, Hicks K . New methylcyclopentanoid terpenes from the larval defensive secretion of a chrysomelid beetle (Plagiodera versicolora). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977; 74(6):2189-93. PMC: 432134. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.74.6.2189. View