» Articles » PMID: 24241902

Irrational Thinking Among Slot Machine Players

Overview
Journal J Gambl Stud
Date 2013 Nov 19
PMID 24241902
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

According to the cognitive perspective on gambling, regular gamblers persist in trying to win money at gambling because they hold a set of false beliefs about the nature of gambling, the likelihood of winning, and their own expertise. In order to investigate this claim, twenty seven university students were recruited who played one of three types of games at least twice a week: slot machines, video draw poker, and video amusement games. Subjects played their preferred machines on site (clubs, hotels and amusement arcades) first for at least thirty minutes and then the other two games for a minimum of twenty minutes each. During play, each subject spoke aloud into a microphone describing what he or she was doing or thinking about in the game. It was hypothesised that slot machine players would verbalise more irrational thinking than video poker or video amusement players and that slot machines would elicit more irrational thinking than video poker or video amusement machines. Most importantly, it was hypothesised that slot machine players would exhibit relatively greater amounts of irrational thinking when playing their preferred game. The data supported all three hypotheses. Out of all of the statements made by slot machine players when playing slot machines, 38% were categorised irrational. Furthermore, 80% of the strategic statements made by slot machine players while playing slot machines were categorised as irrational. These results are consistent with earlier work which showed high levels of irrational thinking in artificial gambling games. Together, the results provide support for a cognitive view of the origins of gambling problems.

Citing Articles

Does gambling preference level affect occupational fraud behavior?-Evidence from a survey study in China.

Huang S, Chen Y, Li B Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1494990.

PMID: 39981389 PMC: 11839647. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1494990.


Effectiveness of a mobile app-based educational intervention to treat internet gaming disorder among Iranian adolescents: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Pakpour A, Fazeli S, Zeidi I, Alimoradi Z, Georgsson M, Brostrom A Trials. 2022; 23(1):229.

PMID: 35313935 PMC: 8935262. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06131-0.


Impulsivity, Self-control, Interpersonal Influences, and Maladaptive Cognitions as Factors of Internet Gaming Disorder Among Adolescents in China: Cross-sectional Mediation Study.

Yu Y, Mo P, Zhang J, Li J, Lau J J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(10):e26810.

PMID: 34704960 PMC: 8581749. DOI: 10.2196/26810.


Protective Action and Risky Beliefs: The Relationship Between Religion and Gambling Fallacies.

Williams B, Browne M, Rockloff M, Stuart G, Smith B J Gambl Stud. 2021; 38(1):253-263.

PMID: 33914236 DOI: 10.1007/s10899-021-10028-z.


Validation of the Chinese Version of the Revised Internet Gaming Cognition Scale among Adolescents in China: Maladaptive Cognitions as Potential Determinants of Internet Gaming Disorder.

Yu Y, Mo P, Zhang J, Li J, Lau J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(1).

PMID: 31906174 PMC: 6982274. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17010290.


References
1.
Letarte A, Ladouceur R, Mayrand M . Primary and secondary illusory control and risk-taking in gambling (roulette). Psychol Rep. 1986; 58(1):299-302. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1986.58.1.299. View

2.
Leary K, Dickerson M . Levels of arousal in high- and low-frequency gamblers. Behav Res Ther. 1985; 23(6):635-40. DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(85)90058-0. View

3.
Anderson G, Brown R . Real and laboratory gambling, sensation-seeking and arousal. Br J Psychol. 1984; 75 ( Pt 3):401-10. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1984.tb01910.x. View

4.
Gilovich T . Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983; 44(6):1110-26. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.44.6.1110. View