» Articles » PMID: 24231900

Validation of an Empirical Damage Model for Aging and in Vivo Injury of the Murine Patellar Tendon

Overview
Journal J Biomech Eng
Date 2013 Nov 16
PMID 24231900
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While useful models have been proposed to predict the mechanical impact of damage in tendon and other soft tissues, the applicability of these models for describing in vivo injury and age-related degeneration has not been investigated. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop and validate a simple damage model to predict mechanical alterations in mouse patellar tendons after aging, injury, or healing. To characterize baseline properties, uninjured controls at age 150 days were cyclically loaded across three strain levels and five frequencies. For comparison, damage was induced in mature (120 day-old) mice through either injury or aging. Injured mice were sacrificed at three or six weeks after surgery, while aged mice were sacrificed at either 300 or 570 days old. Changes in mechanical properties (relative to baseline) in the three week post-injury group were assessed and used to develop an empirical damage model based on a simple damage parameter related to the equilibrium stress at a prescribed strain (6%). From the derived model, the viscoelastic properties of the 300 day-old, 570 day-old, and six week post-injury groups were accurately predicted. Across testing conditions, nearly all correlations between predicted and measured parameters were statistically significant and coefficients of determination ranged from R² = 0.25 to 0.97. Results suggest that the proposed damage model could exploit simple in vivo mechanical measurements to predict how an injured or aged tendon will respond to complex physiological loading regimens.

Citing Articles

Models of tendon development and injury.

Theodossiou S, Schiele N BMC Biomed Eng. 2020; 1.

PMID: 32095779 PMC: 7039524. DOI: 10.1186/s42490-019-0029-5.


Injury response of geriatric mouse patellar tendons.

Mienaltowski M, Dunkman A, Buckley M, Beason D, Adams S, Birk D J Orthop Res. 2015; 34(7):1256-63.

PMID: 26704368 PMC: 4919222. DOI: 10.1002/jor.23144.


Achilles tendons from decorin- and biglycan-null mouse models have inferior mechanical and structural properties predicted by an image-based empirical damage model.

Gordon J, Freedman B, Zuskov A, Iozzo R, Birk D, Soslowsky L J Biomech. 2015; 48(10):2110-5.

PMID: 25888014 PMC: 4492865. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.058.


The role of animal models in tendon research.

Hast M, Zuskov A, Soslowsky L Bone Joint Res. 2014; 3(6):193-202.

PMID: 24958818 PMC: 4116644. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.36.2000281.


Biomechanical and structural response of healing Achilles tendon to fatigue loading following acute injury.

Freedman B, Sarver J, Buckley M, Voleti P, Soslowsky L J Biomech. 2013; 47(9):2028-34.

PMID: 24280564 PMC: 4017004. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.054.


References
1.
Carroll C, Dickinson J, Haus J, Lee G, Hollon C, Aagaard P . Influence of aging on the in vivo properties of human patellar tendon. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008; 105(6):1907-15. PMC: 2612460. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00059.2008. View

2.
Peltz C, Hsu J, Zgonis M, Trasolini N, Glaser D, Soslowsky L . The effect of altered loading following rotator cuff tears in a rat model on the regional mechanical properties of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Biomech. 2010; 43(15):2904-7. PMC: 2975832. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.07.035. View

3.
Parsons I, Apreleva M, Fu F, Woo S . The effect of rotator cuff tears on reaction forces at the glenohumeral joint. J Orthop Res. 2002; 20(3):439-46. DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00137-1. View

4.
Leadbetter W . Cell-matrix response in tendon injury. Clin Sports Med. 1992; 11(3):533-78. View

5.
Razmjou H, Davis A, Jaglal S, Holtby R, Richards R . Disability and satisfaction after rotator cuff decompression or repair: a sex and gender analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011; 12:66. PMC: 3083386. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-66. View