» Articles » PMID: 24231818

Left Ventricular Pressure Gating in Ovine Cardiac Studies: a Software-based Method

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cardiac imaging using magnetic resonance requires a gating signal in order to compensate for motion. Human patients are routinely scanned using an electrocardiogram (ECG) as a gating signal during imaging. However, we found that in sheep the ECG is not a reliable method for gating. We developed a software based method that allowed us to use the left ventricular pressure (LVP) as a reliable gating signal. By taking the time derivative of the LVP (dP/dt), we were able to start imaging at both end-diastole for systolic phase images, and end-systole for diastolic phase images. We also used MR tissue tagging to calculate 3D strain information during diastole. Using the LVP in combination with our digital circuit provided a reliable and time efficient method for ovine cardiac imaging. Unlike the ECG signal the left ventricular pressure was a clean signal and allowed for accurate, nondelay based triggering during systole and diastole.

References
1.
Fischer S, McKinnon G, Maier S, Boesiger P . Improved myocardial tagging contrast. Magn Reson Med. 1993; 30(2):191-200. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910300207. View

2.
BEISCHER D, KNEPTON Jr J . INFLUENCE OF STRONG MAGNETIC FIELDS ON THE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM OF SQUIRREL MONKEYS (SAIMIRI SCIUREUS). Aerosp Med. 1964; 35:939-44. View

3.
Rutz A, Ryf S, Plein S, Boesiger P, Kozerke S . Accelerated whole-heart 3D CSPAMM for myocardial motion quantification. Magn Reson Med. 2008; 59(4):755-63. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21363. View

4.
Guccione J, Walker J, Beitler J, Moonly S, Zhang P, Guttman M . The effect of anteroapical aneurysm plication on end-systolic three-dimensional strain in the sheep: a magnetic resonance imaging tagging study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006; 131(3):579-586.e3. PMC: 1482534. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.07.065. View

5.
Axel L, Dougherty L . MR imaging of motion with spatial modulation of magnetization. Radiology. 1989; 171(3):841-5. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.171.3.2717762. View