» Articles » PMID: 24223894

C-Met As a Prognostic Marker in Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Nov 14
PMID 24223894
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: c-Met has been recognized as an important therapeutic target in gastric cancer, but the prognostic property of the c-Met status is still unclear. We aimed to characterize the prognostic effect of c-Met by systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: We identified 15 studies assessing survival in gastric cancer by c-Met status. Effect measure of interest was hazard ratio (HR) for survival. Meta-regression was performed to estimate the relationship between HR and disease stage. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to account for heterogeneity.

Results: 15 eligible studies provided outcome data stratified by c-Met status in 2210 patients. Meta-analysis of the HRs indicated a significantly poorer Os in patients with high c-Met expression (average HR=2.112, 95%CI: 1.622-2.748). Subgroup analysis showed the prognostic effect of c-Met was identical in protein-level and gene-level based methodology. The same effect was also seen in Asian and Western ethnicity subgroup analysis. Meta-regression showed HR was not associated with disease stage.

Conclusions: Patients with tumors that harbor high c-Met expression are more likely to have a worse Os, with this prognostic effect independent of disease stage. c-Met status should be evaluated in clinical prognosis.

Citing Articles

siRNA-based strategies to combat drug resistance in gastric cancer.

Khaleel A, Alshahrani M, Rizaev J, Malathi H, Devi S, Pramanik A Med Oncol. 2024; 41(11):293.

PMID: 39428440 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-024-02528-w.


Research progress on the development of hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met signaling pathway in gastric cancer: A review.

Wei W, Hong Y, Deng Y, Wang G, Qiu J, Pan F World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024; 16(8):3397-3409.

PMID: 39171189 PMC: 11334049. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i8.3397.


Ferroptosis regulating lipid peroxidation metabolism in the occurrence and development of gastric cancer.

Wang L, Zhang W, Qiu Y, Wang F World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024; 16(6):2781-2792.

PMID: 38994139 PMC: 11236228. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i6.2781.


MET alterations detection platforms and clinical implications in solid tumors: a comprehensive review of literature.

Yuan P, Xue X, Qiu T, Ying J Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024; 16:17588359231221910.

PMID: 38249331 PMC: 10798113. DOI: 10.1177/17588359231221910.


Gastric Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms, Novel Targets, and Immunotherapies: From Bench to Clinical Therapeutics.

Megid T, Farooq A, Wang X, Elimova E Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(20).

PMID: 37894443 PMC: 10605200. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205075.


References
1.
Graziano F, Galluccio N, Lorenzini P, Ruzzo A, Canestrari E, DEmidio S . Genetic activation of the MET pathway and prognosis of patients with high-risk, radically resected gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(36):4789-95. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.7706. View

2.
Han S, Lee H, Lee J, Kim W, Nam H, Kim H . Modulation of E-cadherin by hepatocyte growth factor induces aggressiveness of gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2005; 242(5):676-83. PMC: 1409863. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000186171.85804.fe. View

3.
Lee H, Kim M, Lee H, Jung E, Yang H, Lee B . MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome. Br J Cancer. 2012; 107(2):325-33. PMC: 3394975. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.237. View

4.
Lennerz J, Kwak E, Ackerman A, Michael M, Fox S, Bergethon K . MET amplification identifies a small and aggressive subgroup of esophagogastric adenocarcinoma with evidence of responsiveness to crizotinib. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(36):4803-10. PMC: 3255989. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.4928. View

5.
Huang T, Wang J, Lin S, Lian S, Hsieh J . Overexpression of the c-met protooncogene in human gastric carcinoma--correlation to clinical features. Acta Oncol. 2001; 40(5):638-43. DOI: 10.1080/028418601750444204. View