» Articles » PMID: 24223710

Is the United States Still Dominant in the Global Pharmaceutical Innovation Network?

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Nov 14
PMID 24223710
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The dramatic growth of research and development activities in the pharmaceutical sector in emerging economies raises the question of whether the United States still keeps its dominant role in the global pharmaceutical innovation landscape. This paper focuses on investigating the role of the United States in global pharmaceutical innovation, and differs from previous studies by shifting attention to a network analytic perspective to track the global distribution of pharmaceutical inventions. Our sample is composed of key patents covering all new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration between 1996 and 2010. The results show that the United States still dominates in the global pharmaceutical innovation network, especially when it comes to essential core inventions. However, the United States shows a slightly decreasing prominence in the networks of either total new drugs or New Molecular Entity (NME) drugs in the time period 2006-2010 as compared to previous time periods, revealed by subtle traces of network centralities.

Citing Articles

States, global power and access to medicines: a comparative case study of China, India and the United States, 2000-2019.

Hembre B, Chokshi M, Hoffman S, Suleman F, Andresen S, Sandberg K Global Health. 2025; 21(1):3.

PMID: 39893431 PMC: 11787748. DOI: 10.1186/s12992-024-01092-2.


The dynamics of global R&D collaboration networks in ICT: Does China catch up with the US?.

Scherngell T, Rohde C, Neulandtner M PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0237864.

PMID: 32870926 PMC: 7462303. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237864.


Translating traditional herbal formulas into modern drugs: a network-based analysis of Xiaoyao decoction.

Zhang D, Zhang Y, Gao Y, Chai X, Pi R, Chan G Chin Med. 2020; 15:25.

PMID: 32190105 PMC: 7075005. DOI: 10.1186/s13020-020-00302-4.


Medicinal Plant Analysis: A Historical and Regional Discussion of Emergent Complex Techniques.

Fitzgerald M, Heinrich M, Booker A Front Pharmacol. 2020; 10:1480.

PMID: 31998121 PMC: 6962180. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01480.


A network pharmacology-based approach to analyse potential targets of traditional herbal formulas: An example of Yu Ping Feng decoction.

Zuo H, Zhang Q, Su S, Chen Q, Yang F, Hu Y Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):11418.

PMID: 30061691 PMC: 6065326. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29764-1.


References
1.
. Evolving R&D for emerging markets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010; 9(6):417-20. DOI: 10.1038/nrd3204. View

2.
Singh R . Clinical research in China and India: a paradigm shift in drug development. Drug Discov Today. 2006; 11(15-16):675-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.06.009. View

3.
Lu J, Pan W, Hu Y, Wang Y . Multi-target drugs: the trend of drug research and development. PLoS One. 2012; 7(6):e40262. PMC: 3386979. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040262. View

4.
Kaitin K . Deconstructing the drug development process: the new face of innovation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010; 87(3):356-61. PMC: 2953249. DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2009.293. View

5.
Hather G, Haynes W, Higdon R, Kolker N, Stewart E, Arzberger P . The United States of America and scientific research. PLoS One. 2010; 5(8):e12203. PMC: 2922381. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012203. View