» Articles » PMID: 24222340

An Evolutionary Perspective on the Patterning of Maternal Investment in Pregnancy

Overview
Journal Hum Nat
Date 2013 Nov 14
PMID 24222340
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pregnancy is thought to be a metabolically very expensive endeavor, yet investigations have produced inconsistent results concerning the responsiveness of human birth weight to maternal nutritional stress or nutritional intervention. These findings have led some researchers to conclude that fetal growth is strongly buffered against fluctuations in maternal energy balance, making the fetus in effect a "nearly perfect parasite." This buffering would appear to be a reasonable adaptive response given the high risk of morbidity and mortality associated with low birth weight. However, a life-history approach leads to the prediction that maternal investment strategies in pregnancy should be geared toward maximizing lifetime reproductive success rather than simply the success of the current pregnancy, and by extension that maternal investment strategies should vary with reproductive value. The physiology of human pregnancy in fact appears to include a number of mechanisms that protect maternal energy resources from diversion to the fetus and preserve them for future reproductive events. These mechanisms include adjustment of blood flow to the uterus and perhaps minor adjustments in gestation length, although evidence for the latter is scant. Suggestions are made for ways of investigating these maternal options.

Citing Articles

When and Where Birth Spacing Matters for Child Survival: An International Comparison Using the DHS.

Molitoris J, Barclay K, Kolk M Demography. 2019; 56(4):1349-1370.

PMID: 31270780 PMC: 6667399. DOI: 10.1007/s13524-019-00798-y.


Low birth weight, maternal birth-spacing decisions, and future reproduction : A cost-benefit analysis.

Bereczkei T, Hofer A, Ivan Z Hum Nat. 2015; 11(2):183-205.

PMID: 26193366 DOI: 10.1007/s12110-000-1018-y.


Low birth weight, intrauterine growth-retarded, and pre-term infants : A research strategy.

Abell T Hum Nat. 2013; 3(4):335-78.

PMID: 24222443 DOI: 10.1007/BF02734055.


The evolutionary ecology of attachment organization.

Chisholm J Hum Nat. 2013; 7(1):1-37.

PMID: 24203250 DOI: 10.1007/BF02733488.

References
1.
Petersen S, Gotfredsen A, Knudsen F . Lean body mass in small for gestational age and appropriate for gestational age infants. J Pediatr. 1988; 113(5):886-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(88)80025-8. View

2.
Alexander G, Hulsey T, Smeriglio V, Comfort M, Levkoff A . Factors influencing the relationship between a newborn assessment of gestational maturity and the gestational age interval. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1990; 4(2):133-46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1990.tb00628.x. View

3.
DUBOWITZ L, Dubowitz V, Goldberg C . Clinical assessment of gestational age in the newborn infant. J Pediatr. 1970; 77(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(70)80038-5. View

4.
Garn S, Pesick S . Relationship between various maternal body mass measures and size of the newborn. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982; 36(4):664-8. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/36.4.664. View

5.
Stevens-Simon C, Cullinan J, Stinson S, McAnarney E . Effects of race on the validity of clinical estimates of gestational age. J Pediatr. 1989; 115(6):1000-2. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80758-9. View