» Articles » PMID: 24218531

Diagnostic Accuracy of Level 3 Portable Sleep Tests Versus Level 1 Polysomnography for Sleep-disordered Breathing: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal CMAJ
Date 2013 Nov 13
PMID 24218531
Citations 82
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Greater awareness of sleep-disordered breathing and rising obesity rates have fueled demand for sleep studies. Sleep testing using level 3 portable devices may expedite diagnosis and reduce the costs associated with level 1 in-laboratory polysomnography. We sought to assess the diagnostic accuracy of level 3 testing compared with level 1 testing and to identify the appropriate patient population for each test.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies of level 3 versus level 1 sleep tests in adults with suspected sleep-disordered breathing. We searched 3 research databases and grey literature sources for studies that reported on diagnostic accuracy parameters or disease management after diagnosis. Two reviewers screened the search results, selected potentially relevant studies and extracted data. We used a bivariate mixed-effects binary regression model to estimate summary diagnostic accuracy parameters.

Results: We included 59 studies involving a total of 5026 evaluable patients (mostly patients suspected of having obstructive sleep apnea). Of these, 19 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The estimated area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was high, ranging between 0.85 and 0.99 across different levels of disease severity. Summary sensitivity ranged between 0.79 and 0.97, and summary specificity ranged between 0.60 and 0.93 across different apnea-hypopnea cut-offs. We saw no significant difference in the clinical management parameters between patients who underwent either test to receive their diagnosis.

Interpretation: Level 3 portable devices showed good diagnostic performance compared with level 1 sleep tests in adult patients with a high pretest probability of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea and no unstable comorbidities. For patients suspected of having other types of sleep-disordered breathing or sleep disorders not related to breathing, level 1 testing remains the reference standard.

Citing Articles

Deep learning enhanced transmembranous electromyography in the diagnosis of sleep apnea.

Mandeville R, Sedghamiz H, Mansfield P, Sheean G, Studer C, Cordice D BMC Neurosci. 2024; 25(1):80.

PMID: 39741274 PMC: 11686987. DOI: 10.1186/s12868-024-00913-9.


Up-to-date advance in the relationship between obstructive sleep apnea and heart failure: a narrative review.

Shi Y, Deng D, Song N Sleep Breath. 2024; 29(1):2.

PMID: 39585472 DOI: 10.1007/s11325-024-03170-6.


Level 2 Polysomnography for the Diagnosis of Sleep Disorders: A Health Technology Assessment.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2024; 24(7):1-157.

PMID: 39372311 PMC: 11450293.


Mandibular movement monitor provides faster, yet accurate diagnosis for obstructive sleep apnoea: A randomised controlled study.

Alsaif S, Douglas W, Steier J, Morrell M, Polkey M, Kelly J Clin Med (Lond). 2024; 24(4):100231.

PMID: 39047815 PMC: 11345283. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinme.2024.100231.


Obstructive Sleep Apnea as a Key Contributor to Mental Stress-Induced Myocardial Ischemia in Female Angina Patients with No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

Liu F, Wang H, Bai B, Yin H, Liu Y, Wang Y Nat Sci Sleep. 2024; 16:823-832.

PMID: 38911317 PMC: 11192149. DOI: 10.2147/NSS.S445219.


References
1.
Gjevre J, Taylor-Gjevre R, Skomro R, Reid J, Fenton M, Cotton D . Comparison of polysomnographic and portable home monitoring assessments of obstructive sleep apnea in Saskatchewan women. Can Respir J. 2011; 18(5):271-4. PMC: 3267604. DOI: 10.1155/2011/408091. View

2.
Kuna S, Gurubhagavatula I, Maislin G, Hin S, Hartwig K, McCloskey S . Noninferiority of functional outcome in ambulatory management of obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011; 183(9):1238-44. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201011-1770OC. View

3.
Hamza T, van Houwelingen H, Stijnen T . The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 61(1):41-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.016. View

4.
Ayappa I, Norman R, Seelall V, Rapoport D . Validation of a self-applied unattended monitor for sleep disordered breathing. J Clin Sleep Med. 2008; 4(1):26-37. PMC: 2276822. View

5.
Ng S, Chan T, To K, Ngai J, Tung A, Ko F . Validation of Embletta portable diagnostic system for identifying patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS). Respirology. 2010; 15(2):336-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2009.01697.x. View