» Articles » PMID: 24214708

Time to Read Semantically Related Sentences*

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2013 Nov 12
PMID 24214708
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ss read sentences specifying relations among concepts, with the sentences related to each other in different hierarchical structures. In the case where sentences had implicative relationships, time to read sentences low in the hierarchy was less if sentences higher in the hierarchy had been read previously, and sentences inconsistent with expectations based on earlier items took longer. However, when structural relations did not involve implication about content, time to read the sentences was not very different regardless of whether related sentences had been read previously.

Citing Articles

Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention.

Gernsbacher M, Hargreaves D J Mem Lang. 2014; 27(6):699-717.

PMID: 25520541 PMC: 4266409. DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90016-2.


Two Decades of Structure Building.

Gernsbacher M Discourse Process. 2014; 23(3):265-304.

PMID: 25484476 PMC: 4255941. DOI: 10.1080/01638539709544994.


Surface Information Loss in Comprehension.

Gernsbacher M Cogn Psychol. 2014; 17(3):324-363.

PMID: 25308975 PMC: 4191867. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(85)90012-X.


Prediction, events, and the advantage of agents: the processing of semantic roles in visual narrative.

Cohn N, Paczynski M Cogn Psychol. 2013; 67(3):73-97.

PMID: 23959023 PMC: 3895484. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.07.002.


(Pea)nuts and bolts of visual narrative: structure and meaning in sequential image comprehension.

Cohn N, Paczynski M, Jackendoff R, Holcomb P, Kuperberg G Cogn Psychol. 2012; 65(1):1-38.

PMID: 22387723 PMC: 3331971. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.01.003.