The Effects of Auditory Shadowing on Recognition of Information Received Visually
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
When Ss attend to one auditory message, they have no permanent memory for a second auditory message received simultaneously. Generally, it has been argued that a similar effect would occur crossmodally. This hypothesis was tested in the present experiment for messages presented to visual and auditory modalities. All Ss were tested for recognition of information presented either while shadowing or while hearing but not shadowing a passage of prose presented to one ear. One group heard a list of concrete nouns in their other ear. Three other groups received (1) printed words. (2) pictures of objects easily labeled, or (3) pictures of objects difficult to label. The shadowing task produced a decrement m recognition scores for the first three groups but not for the group receiving pictures of objects difficult to label. Further, the shadowing task interfered more with information received auditorily than with any form of visual information. These results suggest that information received visually is stored in a long-term modality-specific memory that may operate independently of the auditory modality.
Auditory and visual confusions: Evidence against simple modality encoding hypotheses.
Briggs R Mem Cognit. 2013; 2(4):607-12.
PMID: 24203727 DOI: 10.3758/BF03198128.
Simultaneous processing of verbal and spatial information.
Salthouse T Mem Cognit. 2011; 3(2):221-5.
PMID: 21287063 DOI: 10.3758/BF03212901.
Is visual attention required for robust picture memory?.
Wolfe J, Horowitz T, Michod K Vision Res. 2007; 47(7):955-64.
PMID: 17306854 PMC: 1857419. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.025.
Miller J Percept Psychophys. 1987; 41(5):419-34.
PMID: 3601624 DOI: 10.3758/bf03203035.
Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory.
Penney C Mem Cognit. 1989; 17(4):398-422.
PMID: 2668697 DOI: 10.3758/bf03202613.