» Articles » PMID: 24211237

Effect of Dopamine D1 and D2 Receptor Antagonism in the Lateral Hypothalamus on the Expression and Acquisition of Fructose-conditioned Flavor Preference in Rats

Overview
Journal Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Nov 12
PMID 24211237
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The attraction to sugar-rich foods is influenced by conditioned flavor preferences (CFP) produced by the sweet taste of sugar (flavor-flavor learning) and the sugar's post-oral actions (flavor-nutrient) learning. Brain dopamine (DA) circuits are involved in both types of flavor learning, but to different degrees. This study investigated the role of DA receptors in the lateral hypothalamus (LH) on the flavor-flavor learning produced the sweet taste of fructose. In an acquisition study, food-restricted rats received bilateral LH injections of a DA D1 receptor antagonist (SCH23390), a D2 antagonist (RAC, raclopride) or vehicle prior to 1-bottle training sessions with a flavored 8% fructose+0.2% saccharin solution (CS+/F) and a less-preferred flavored 0.2% saccharin solution (CS-). Drug-free 2-bottle tests were then conducted with the CS+ and CS- flavors presented in saccharin. The fructose-CFP did not differ among groups given vehicle (76%), 12 nmol SCH (78%), 24 nmol (82%) or 24 nmol RAC (90%) during training. In an expression study with rats trained drug-free, LH injections of 12 or 24 nmol SCH or 12-48 nmol RAC prior to 2-bottle tests did not alter CS+ preferences (77-90%) relative to vehicle injection (86%). Only a 48 nmol SCH dose suppressed the CS+ preference (61%). The minimal effect of LH DA receptor antagonism upon fructose flavor-flavor conditioning differs with the ability of LH SCH injections to block the acquisition of glucose flavor-nutrient learning.

Citing Articles

Leptin Prevents Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Depressive-Like Behaviors in Mice: Involvement of Dopamine Receptors.

Cordeiro R, Chaves Filho A, Gomes N, Tomaz V, Medeiros C, Queiroz A Front Psychiatry. 2019; 10:125.

PMID: 30949073 PMC: 6436077. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00125.


The Role of Dorsal Hippocampal Dopamine D1-Type Receptors in Social Learning, Social Interactions, and Food Intake in Male and Female Mice.

Matta R, Tiessen A, Choleris E Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017; 42(12):2344-2353.

PMID: 28240292 PMC: 5645744. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2017.43.


Dopamine receptor signaling in the medial orbital frontal cortex and the acquisition and expression of fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats.

Malkusz D, Yenko I, Rotella F, Banakos T, Olsson K, Dindyal T Brain Res. 2014; 1596:116-25.

PMID: 25446441 PMC: 4388031. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.11.028.


Dietary sugars: their detection by the gut-brain axis and their peripheral and central effects in health and diseases.

Ochoa M, Lalles J, Malbert C, Val-Laillet D Eur J Nutr. 2014; 54(1):1-24.

PMID: 25296886 PMC: 4303703. DOI: 10.1007/s00394-014-0776-y.

References
1.
Yu W, Silva R, Sclafani A, Delamater A, Bodnar R . Role of D(1) and D(2) dopamine receptors in the acquisition and expression of flavor-preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2001; 67(3):537-44. DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(00)00396-8. View

2.
Baker R, Shah M, Sclafani A, Bodnar R . Dopamine D1 and D2 antagonists reduce the acquisition and expression of flavor-preferences conditioned by fructose in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2003; 75(1):55-65. DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(03)00039-x. View

3.
Bourne J . SCH 23390: the first selective dopamine D1-like receptor antagonist. CNS Drug Rev. 2002; 7(4):399-414. PMC: 6741643. DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-3458.2001.tb00207.x. View

4.
Asan E . Ultrastructural features of tyrosine-hydroxylase-immunoreactive afferents and their targets in the rat amygdala. Cell Tissue Res. 1997; 288(3):449-69. DOI: 10.1007/s004410050832. View

5.
Mansour A, Meador-Woodruff J, Zhou Q, Civelli O, Akil H, Watson S . A comparison of D1 receptor binding and mRNA in rat brain using receptor autoradiographic and in situ hybridization techniques. Neuroscience. 1992; 46(4):959-71. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90197-a. View