» Articles » PMID: 24204731

The Impact of Japan's 2004 Postgraduate Training Program on Intra-prefectural Distribution of Pediatricians in Japan

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Nov 9
PMID 24204731
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Inequity in physician distribution poses a challenge to many health systems. In Japan, a new postgraduate training program for all new medical graduates was introduced in 2004, and researchers have argued that this program has increased inequalities in physician distribution. We examined the trends in the geographic distribution of pediatricians as well as all physicians from 1996 to 2010 to identify the impact of the launch of the new training program.

Methods: The Gini coefficient was calculated using municipalities as the study unit within each prefecture to assess whether there were significant changes in the intra-prefectural distribution of all physicians and pediatricians before and after the launch of the new training program. The effect of the new program was quantified by estimating the difference in the slope in the time trend of the Gini coefficients before and after 2004 using a linear change-point regression design. We categorized 47 prefectures in Japan into two groups: 1) predominantly urban and 2) others by the definition from OECD to conduct stratified analyses by urban-rural status.

Results: The trends in physician distribution worsened after 2004 for all physicians (p value<.0001) and pediatricians (p value = 0.0057). For all physicians, the trends worsened after 2004 both in predominantly urban prefectures (p value = 0.0012) and others (p value<0.0001), whereas, for pediatricians, the distribution worsened in others (p value = 0.0343), but not in predominantly urban prefectures (p value =0.0584).

Conclusion: The intra-prefectural distribution of physicians worsened after the launch of the new training program, which may reflect the impact of the new postgraduate program. In pediatrics, changes in the Gini trend differed significantly before and after the launch of the new training program in others, but not in predominantly urban prefectures. Further observation is needed to explore how this difference in trends affects the health status of the child population.

Citing Articles

Inter-prefectural and urban-rural regional disparities in rectal cancer and rectal resections: A Japanese nationwide population-based cohort study from 2014 to 2019.

Kido M, Arita T, Shoda K, Shimizu H, Kiuchi J, Nanishi K Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2025; 9(2):281-287.

PMID: 40046527 PMC: 11877343. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12865.


Inter-prefectural regional disparities in gastric cancer surgery: A Japanese nationwide population-based cohort study from 2014 to 2019.

Kido M, Shoda K, Yan L, Ikoma K, Ichikawa D Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024; 8(6):1017-1025.

PMID: 39502726 PMC: 11533019. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12813.


Inter-prefectural and urban-rural regional disparities in lung cancer surgery: a Japanese nationwide population-based cohort study from 2017 to 2019.

Kido M, Okada S, Takashima N, Yan L, Uchibori A, Sensaki K Surg Today. 2024; 54(12):1428-1436.

PMID: 38739174 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-024-02864-4.


The inter-prefectural regional disparity of healthcare resources and representative surgical procedures in orthopaedics and general surgery: a nationwide study in Japan during 2015-2019.

Kido M, Ikoma K, Kobayashi Y, Maki M, Ohashi S, Shoda K BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1):726.

PMID: 37700283 PMC: 10496376. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06820-0.


Characteristics of University Hospitals Implementing the Postgraduate Clinical Training "Tasukigake Method" and Their Correlation with Program Popularity: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Watanabe S, Kataoka K, Sekine M, Aune D, Shikino K, Nishizaki Y Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023; 14:323-332.

PMID: 37026061 PMC: 10072141. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S402259.


References
1.
Rosenthal M, Zaslavsky A, Newhouse J . The geographic distribution of physicians revisited. Health Serv Res. 2005; 40(6 Pt 1):1931-52. PMC: 1361233. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00440.x. View

2.
Matsumoto M, Inoue K, Farmer J, Inada H, Kajii E . Geographic distribution of primary care physicians in Japan and Britain. Health Place. 2009; 16(1):164-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.07.005. View

3.
McEldowney R, Berry A . Physician supply and distribution in the USA. J Manag Med. 1994; 9(5):68-74. DOI: 10.1108/02689239510096839. View

4.
Smith K, Humphreys J, Wilson M . Addressing the health disadvantage of rural populations: how does epidemiological evidence inform rural health policies and research?. Aust J Rural Health. 2008; 16(2):56-66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2008.00953.x. View

5.
Hann M, Gravelle H . The maldistribution of general practitioners in England and Wales: 1974-2003. Br J Gen Pract. 2004; 54(509):894-8. PMC: 1326105. View