» Articles » PMID: 24202897

Letters Are Functional in Word Identification

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2013 Nov 9
PMID 24202897
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Are words identified as if they are single-unit patterns, or does letter processing mediate word identification? In the main, accuracy experiments have been found to support the mediated model, whereas recent reaction time experiments have been interpreted in favor of the single-unit pattern hypothesis. In the latter experiments, subjects could search for a target word in a test word as quickly as for a target letter in a test letter. The analysis of these results, however, did not consider the role of parallel processing of individual letters, lateral masking, limited capacity, and similarity between the target and test alternatives. In the present experiment, the advantage of parallel processing of letters in words was attenuated by manipulating similarity. The reaction times showed a processing advantage for single letters over words. This result as well as all of the previous results can be described in terms of processing mechanisms of the mediated model, the same mechanisms that have already been utilized to describe the accuracy of letter and word identification in tachistoscopic experiments.

Citing Articles

Letter legibility and visual word recognition.

Nazir T, Jacobs A, ORegan J Mem Cognit. 1998; 26(4):810-21.

PMID: 9701972 DOI: 10.3758/bf03211400.


Letters and words in word identification.

Umansky J, Chambers S Mem Cognit. 1980; 8(5):433-46.

PMID: 7442546 DOI: 10.3758/bf03211140.


Repeating the target neither speeds nor slows its detection: evidence for independent channels in letter processing.

Krueger L, Shapiro R Percept Psychophys. 1980; 28(1):68-76.

PMID: 7413412 DOI: 10.3758/bf03204317.


Identification and pronunciation effects in a verbal reaction time task for words, pseudowords, and letters.

Rossmeissl P, THEIOS J Mem Cognit. 1982; 10(5):443-50.

PMID: 7176904 DOI: 10.3758/bf03197646.


Part-whole relationships in the processing of small visual patterns.

Johnson N, Pettegrew B Mem Cognit. 1986; 14(1):5-16.

PMID: 3713507 DOI: 10.3758/bf03209224.

References
1.
Bouma H . Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature. 1970; 226(5241):177-8. DOI: 10.1038/226177a0. View

2.
Garner W, HAKE H, Eriksen C . Operationism and the concept of perception. Psychol Rev. 1956; 63(3):149-59. DOI: 10.1037/h0042992. View

3.
Chambers S, Forster K . Evidence for lexical access in a simultaneous matching task. Mem Cognit. 2013; 3(5):549-59. DOI: 10.3758/BF03197530. View

4.
Bouma H . Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters. Vision Res. 1971; 11(5):459-74. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(71)90087-3. View

5.
Bouma H . Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Res. 1973; 13(4):767-82. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(73)90041-2. View