» Articles » PMID: 24201880

Factors Influencing Transformation Frequency of Tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentum)

Overview
Journal Plant Cell Rep
Publisher Springer
Date 2013 Nov 9
PMID 24201880
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We developed an efficient procedure for transformation and regeneration of L. esculentum cv. Moneymaker from cotyledon explants. The effect of two parameters on the transformation frequency was investigated in detail. The use of feeder layers during cocultivation proved to be critical. In addition, it was found that Agrobacterium strains harbouring a L,L-succinamopine type helper plasmid yielded significantly higher transformation frequencies than those with octopine or nopaline type helper plasmids. The optimized protocol was used to obtain transformation frequencies averaging 9%. Of the plants produced approximately 80% proved to be diploid, of which 67% contained the transgene(s) on a single locus.

Citing Articles

Optimization of Tomato Shoot Architecture by Combined Mutations in the Floral Activators and the Repressor .

Jiang X, Lopez-Martin M, Gomez-Mena C, Ferrandiz C, Bemer M Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(3).

PMID: 39940929 PMC: 11817714. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26031161.


Comparison of Cas12a and Cas9-mediated mutagenesis in tomato cells.

Slaman E, Kottenhagen L, de Martines W, Angenent G, de Maagd R Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):4508.

PMID: 38402312 PMC: 10894265. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55088-4.


TM3 and STM3 Promote Flowering Together with FUL2 and MBP20, but Act Antagonistically in Inflorescence Branching in Tomato.

Zahn I, Roelofsen C, Angenent G, Bemer M Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(15).

PMID: 37570908 PMC: 10420972. DOI: 10.3390/plants12152754.


FRUITFULL-like genes regulate flowering time and inflorescence architecture in tomato.

Jiang X, Lubini G, Hernandes-Lopes J, Rijnsburger K, Veltkamp V, de Maagd R Plant Cell. 2021; 34(3):1002-1019.

PMID: 34893888 PMC: 8894982. DOI: 10.1093/plcell/koab298.


A simple method for tomato transformation by inoculating floral buds with a sticky suspension.

Honda C, Ohkawa K, Kusano H, Teramura H, Shimada H Plant Biotechnol (Tokyo). 2021; 38(1):153-156.

PMID: 34177335 PMC: 8215470. DOI: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.20.0707a.


References
1.
Weide R, Koornneef M, Zabel P . A simple, nondestructive spraying assay for the detection of an active kanamycin resistance gene in transgenic tomato plants. Theor Appl Genet. 2013; 78(2):169-72. DOI: 10.1007/BF00288794. View

2.
Gamborg O, Miller R, Ojima K . Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res. 1968; 50(1):151-8. DOI: 10.1016/0014-4827(68)90403-5. View

3.
van den Bulk R, Loffler H, Lindhout W, Koornneef M . Somaclonal variation in tomato: effect of explant source and a comparison with chemical mutagenesis. Theor Appl Genet. 2013; 80(6):817-25. DOI: 10.1007/BF00224199. View

4.
Pen J, Molendijk L, Quax W, Sijmons P, van Ooyen A, van den Elzen P . Production of active Bacillus licheniformis alpha-amylase in tobacco and its application in starch liquefaction. Biotechnology (N Y). 1992; 10(3):292-6. DOI: 10.1038/nbt0392-292. View

5.
Vancanneyt G, Schmidt R, Willmitzer L, Rocha-Sosa M . Construction of an intron-containing marker gene: splicing of the intron in transgenic plants and its use in monitoring early events in Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Mol Gen Genet. 1990; 220(2):245-50. DOI: 10.1007/BF00260489. View