» Articles » PMID: 24200415

Laminoplasty Versus Conservative Treatment for Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Caused by Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament After Minor Trauma

Overview
Journal Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2013 Nov 9
PMID 24200415
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background Context: No reports to date have accurately evaluated the management for acute spinal cord injury (SCI) caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) after minor trauma.

Purpose: To assess whether outcomes of laminoplasty is better than conservative treatment.

Study Design/setting: A retrospective study.

Patient Sample: Thirty-one patients underwent surgery (L group) and 29 patients underwent conservative treatment (C group).

Outcome Measures: Disability, muscle strength, sensation, and general health status.

Methods: Patients were managed according to routine clinical practice and the results between groups were compared. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed at admission, discharge, 6 months and at the final visit. Causes for trauma, duration of hospital stay, and complication were also evaluated.

Results: Causes for trauma included falling, traffic accidents and sports. Mixed and segmental types were the most frequent cause of OPLL resulting into SCI. Duration of hospital stay and complications were less in the L group. Motor and sensory scores increased in the L group at discharge (p<.05) and at 6 months (p<.05), and maintained thereafter (p>.05); scores improved significantly in the C group at 6 months (p<.05), with a slight deterioration with time (p>.05); scores in the L group were higher than in the C group at each time point after surgery (p<.05). Bodily pain and mental health in SF-36 improved at discharge in the L group (p<.05); all scores improved at 6 months in both the groups (p<.05), with better improvements in the L group (p<.05). The canal diameter increased and occupation ratio decreased in the L group (p<.05), and maintained thereafter (p<.05); a slight increase of occupation ratio was observed in the C group (p>.05). Lordotic angle and range of motion were maintained in both the groups, with no significance between groups (p>.05). High-signal intensity decreased at 6 months (p<.05) in the L group; no significant change was found in the C group during the follow-up (p>.05); Significant difference was detected between the groups at 6 months and at the final visit (p<.05).

Conclusions: Most of the OPLL patients displayed as incomplete SCI after minor trauma. Although spontaneous improvement of SCI without surgery is often observed, laminoplasty has more satisfactory outcomes, prevents late compression of cord, and reduces perioperative complications, although with no significant benefit in cervical alignment and range of motion.

Citing Articles

Effects of two posterior procedures for treatment of cervical hyperextension injury with multilevel spinal stenosis: A retrospective study.

Liang Z, Guo T, Xu Y, Zhao C, Zhao J, Cheng X BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):972.

PMID: 39604898 PMC: 11603961. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08096-4.


Cervical single open-door laminoplasty with or without local lateral mass screw fixation and fusion to treat cervical spinal cord injuries accompanied by segmental spinal canal stenosis.

Yu Z, Xie H, Ouyang Z, Zhang H Front Surg. 2023; 9:1050308.

PMID: 36684349 PMC: 9845616. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1050308.


Comparison of the operative time for open door laminoplasty using titanium plate spacers or hydroxyapatite block spacers: a retrospective study.

Inui T, Inokuchi K, Watanabe Y, Matsui K, Nakayama Y, Ishii K J Orthop Surg Res. 2020; 14(1):475.

PMID: 31888719 PMC: 6936073. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1539-5.


A Systematic Review of Classification Systems for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

Tetreault L, Nakashima H, Kato S, Kryshtalskyj M, Nagoshi N, Nouri A Global Spine J. 2019; 9(1):85-103.

PMID: 30775213 PMC: 6362555. DOI: 10.1177/2192568217720421.


Nonoperative Versus Operative Management for the Treatment Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: An Updated Systematic Review.

Rhee J, Tetreault L, Chapman J, Wilson J, Smith J, Martin A Global Spine J. 2017; 7(3 Suppl):35S-41S.

PMID: 29164031 PMC: 5684842. DOI: 10.1177/2192568217703083.