» Articles » PMID: 24199199

The Microbiology of Olive Mill Wastes

Overview
Journal Biomed Res Int
Publisher Wiley
Date 2013 Nov 8
PMID 24199199
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Olive mill wastes (OMWs) are high-strength organic effluents, which upon disposal can degrade soil and water quality, negatively affecting aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. The main purpose of this review paper is to provide an up-to-date knowledge concerning the microbial communities identified over the past 20 years in olive mill wastes using both culture-dependent and independent approaches. A database survey of 16S rRNA gene sequences (585 records in total) obtained from olive mill waste environments revealed the dominance of members of Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria. Independent studies confirmed that OMW microbial communities' structure is cultivar dependent. On the other hand, the detection of fecal bacteria and other potential human pathogens in OMWs is of major concern and deserves further examination. Despite the fact that the degradation and detoxification of the olive mill wastes have been mostly investigated through the application of known bacterial and fungal species originated from other environmental sources, the biotechnological potential of indigenous microbiota should be further exploited in respect to olive mill waste bioremediation and inactivation of plant and human pathogens. The implementation of omic and metagenomic approaches will further elucidate disposal issues of olive mill wastes.

Citing Articles

Olive mill wastewater treatment using vertical flow constructed wetlands (VFCWs).

Abu-Dalo M, Abu-Dalo D, Halalsheh M, Al Bawab A BMC Chem. 2024; 18(1):234.

PMID: 39574128 PMC: 11583398. DOI: 10.1186/s13065-024-01348-3.


Effective Detoxification of Olive Mill Wastewater Using Multi-Step Surfactant-Based Treatment: Assessment of Environmental and Health Impact.

Akkam Y, Zaitoun M, Aljarrah I, Jaradat A, Hmedat A, Alhmoud H Molecules. 2024; 29(18).

PMID: 39339279 PMC: 11434139. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29184284.


Olive mill wastes: from wastes to resources.

Enaime G, Dababat S, Wichern M, Lubken M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024; 31(14):20853-20880.

PMID: 38407704 PMC: 10948480. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-024-32468-x.


Microbiome Associated with Olive Cultivation: A Review.

Melloni R, Cardoso E Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(4).

PMID: 36840245 PMC: 9963204. DOI: 10.3390/plants12040897.


Nocellara Del Belice ( L. Cultivar): Leaf Extract Concentrated in Phenolic Compounds and Its Anti-Inflammatory and Radical Scavenging Activity.

Musolino V, Macri R, Cardamone A, Serra M, Coppoletta A, Tucci L Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(1).

PMID: 36616158 PMC: 9824270. DOI: 10.3390/plants12010027.


References
1.
Cambria M, Ragusa S, Calabrese V, Cambria A . Enhanced laccase production in white-rot fungus Rigidoporus lignosus by the addition of selected phenolic and aromatic compounds. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010; 163(3):415-22. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-010-9049-2. View

2.
Bertin L, Colao M, Ruzzi M, Fava F . Performances and microbial features of a granular activated carbon packed-bed biofilm reactor capable of an efficient anaerobic digestion of olive mill wastewaters. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009; 48(3):413-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.03.009. View

3.
Martinez-Garcia G, Johnson A, Bachmann R, Williams C, Burgoyne A, Edyvean R . Anaerobic treatment of olive mill wastewater and piggery effluents fermented with Candida tropicalis. J Hazard Mater. 2008; 164(2-3):1398-405. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.055. View

4.
Tsiamis G, Tzagkaraki G, Chamalaki A, Xypteras N, Andersen G, Vayenas D . Olive-mill wastewater bacterial communities display a cultivar specific profile. Curr Microbiol. 2011; 64(2):197-203. DOI: 10.1007/s00284-011-0049-4. View

5.
Ntougias S, Baldrian P, Ehaliotis C, Nerud F, Antoniou T, Merhautova V . Biodegradation and detoxification of olive mill wastewater by selected strains of the mushroom genera Ganoderma and Pleurotus. Chemosphere. 2012; 88(5):620-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.042. View