» Articles » PMID: 24198637

New Developments in the Use of Prostatic Stents

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Urology
Date 2013 Nov 8
PMID 24198637
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bladder outflow obstruction is a very common age-related clinical entity due to a variety of benign and malignant diseases of the prostate. Surgical treatment under general or regional anesthesia is not suitable for high-risk elderly patients who seek minimally invasive management. Unfortunately, for patients who are not fit for transurethral and/or laser prostatectomy, few treatment options remain, other than long-term catheterization and insertion (under local anesthesia) of a prostatic stent. In this review, we present developments in the use of prostatic stents.

Citing Articles

Recent Advancements in Prostate Catheters and Stents for Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Lama J, Winograd J, Codelia-Anjum A, Bhojani N, Elterman D, Zorn K Curr Urol Rep. 2024; 26(1):9.

PMID: 39373947 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01235-3.


Procedural Intervention for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Men ≥ Age 70 Years - A Review of Published Literature.

Codelia-Anjum A, Berjaoui M, Khondker A, Elterman D, Zorn K, Bhojani N Clin Interv Aging. 2023; 18:1705-1717.

PMID: 37849957 PMC: 10577238. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S414799.


The EXPANDER-1 trial: introduction of the novel Urocross™ Expander System for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Woo H, Huang C, Huang W, Chang Y, Lien C, Chkhotua A Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022; 25(3):576-582.

PMID: 35641601 PMC: 9385491. DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00548-z.


The UroLift implant: mechanism behind rapid and durable relief from prostatic obstruction.

Roehrborn C, Chin P, Woo H Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021; 25(1):79-85.

PMID: 34363010 PMC: 9018420. DOI: 10.1038/s41391-021-00434-0.


An Update on Minimally Invasive Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Techniques, Risks, and Efficacy.

Srinivasan A, Wang R World J Mens Health. 2019; 38(4):402-411.

PMID: 31496146 PMC: 7502324. DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.190076.


References
1.
Tomschi W, Luftenegger W . [The urological spiral. A real alternative to the indwelling catheter? Experience in 23 patients]. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1990; 102(21):650-3. View

2.
Markovic B, Markovic Z, Yachia D, Hadzi D . [A new generation of urethral stents--Allium in the therapy of symptomatic prostatic enlargement of various etiology]. Acta Chir Iugosl. 2007; 54(3):71-6. DOI: 10.2298/aci0703071m. View

3.
De Vocht T, van Venrooij G, Boon T . Self-expanding stent insertion for urethral strictures: a 10-year follow-up. BJU Int. 2003; 91(7):627-30. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04200.x. View

4.
Yoon C, Song H, Kim J, Park H, Kang H, Ro J . Temporary placement of a covered, retrievable, barbed stent for the treatment of hormone-induced benign prostatic hyperplasia: technical feasibility and histologic changes in canine prostates. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010; 21(9):1429-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.05.013. View

5.
Madersbacher S, Alivizatos G, Nordling J, Rioja Sanz C, Emberton M, de la Rosette J . EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines). Eur Urol. 2004; 46(5):547-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.07.016. View