» Articles » PMID: 24190909

Visual Working Memory Modulates Low-level Saccade Target Selection: Evidence from Rapidly Generated Saccades in the Global Effect Paradigm

Overview
Journal J Vis
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2013 Nov 6
PMID 24190909
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In three experiments, we examined the influence of visual working memory (VWM) on the metrics of saccade landing position in a global effect paradigm. Participants executed a saccade to the more eccentric object in an object pair appearing on the horizontal midline, to the left or right of central fixation. While completing the saccade task, participants maintained a color in VWM for an unrelated memory task. Either the color of the saccade target matched the memory color (target match), the color of the distractor matched the memory color (distractor match), or the colors of neither object matched the memory color (no match). In the no-match condition, saccades tended to land at the midpoint between the two objects: the global, or averaging, effect. However, when one of the two objects matched VWM, the distribution of landing position shifted toward the matching object, both for target match and for distractor match. VWM modulation of landing position was observed even for the fastest quartile of saccades, with a mean latency as low as 112 ms. Effects of VWM on such rapidly generated saccades, with latencies in the express-saccade range, indicate that VWM interacts with the initial sweep of visual sensory processing, modulating perceptual input to oculomotor systems and thereby biasing oculomotor selection. As a result, differences in memory match produce effects on landing position similar to the effects generated by differences in physical salience.

Citing Articles

Motor learning by selection in visual working memory.

Wagner I, Wolf C, Schutz A Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):9331.

PMID: 33927227 PMC: 8085138. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87572-6.


Psychophysical dual-task setups do not measure pre-saccadic attention but saccade-related strengthening of sensory representations.

Huber-Huber C, Steininger J, Gruner M, Ansorge U Psychophysiology. 2021; 58(5):e13787.

PMID: 33615491 PMC: 8244053. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13787.


Visual working memory content influences correspondence processes.

Hein E, Stepper M, Hollingworth A, Moore C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021; 47(3):331-343.

PMID: 33507771 PMC: 9073926. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000890.


Oculomotor capture by search-irrelevant features in visual working memory: on the crucial role of target-distractor similarity.

Foerster R, Schneider W Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020; 82(5):2379-2392.

PMID: 32166644 PMC: 7343749. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02007-0.


Feature-based guidance of attention by visual working memory is applied independently of remembered object location.

Hollingworth A, Bahle B Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019; 82(1):98-108.

PMID: 31140137 PMC: 6881539. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01759-8.


References
1.
Brockmole J, Castelhano M, Henderson J . Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006; 32(4):699-706. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.699. View

2.
Vickery T, King L, Jiang Y . Setting up the target template in visual search. J Vis. 2005; 5(1):81-92. DOI: 10.1167/5.1.8. View

3.
Wolfe J . Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 1(2):202-38. DOI: 10.3758/BF03200774. View

4.
Hollingworth A, Hwang S . The relationship between visual working memory and attention: retention of precise colour information in the absence of effects on perceptual selection. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013; 368(1628):20130061. PMC: 3758204. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0061. View

5.
Land M, Hayhoe M . In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities?. Vision Res. 2001; 41(25-26):3559-65. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00102-x. View