» Articles » PMID: 24186264

Stage II-IV Lung Cancer Cases with Lymphovascular Invasion Relapse Within 2 Years After Surgery

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: For recurrent lung cancer, postoperative follow-up methods have not been adequately assessed, and no evidence-based postoperative surveillance methods currently exist. Herein, we evaluated postoperative lung cancer recurrence and the personalized postoperative surveillance periods and methods used.

Methods: Follow-up after surgery consisted of a regular outpatient clinic check-up, including physical examination, history, blood tests, and chest X-ray, which were conducted three or four times per year for 5 years. During the follow-up period, annual chest and brain computed tomography scanning was performed. Between May 2004 and December 2011, 547 lung cancer patients underwent complete resection in our institution. We retrospectively reviewed their prospectively collected data.

Results: We selected 106 patients (19.4 %) who had a postoperative recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed that advanced stage (stage II-IV; p < 0.01) and lymphovascular invasion positivity (LVI; p = 0.01) were independent risk factors for earlier recurrence. Overall, 90.8 % of patients with advanced-stage disease and LVI positivity experienced a relapse within 2 years after surgery, compared to 55.1 % of patients who did not have these factors (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that recurrence with symptoms (p < 0.01) and shorter time to recurrence (<24 months; p < 0.01) were independent prognostic factors after recurrence.

Conclusions: Although this study was retrospective and included some biases, patients with advanced-stage lung cancer and LVI positivity should be intensively followed up. Personalized follow-up programs should be considered for lung cancer patients who have undergone resection.

Citing Articles

Prognostic factors for relapse-free survival in stage IB-IIIA primary lung adenocarcinoma by epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status.

Isaka T, Ito H, Yokose T, Saito H, Adachi H, Murakami K BMC Cancer. 2022; 22(1):966.

PMID: 36085020 PMC: 9463865. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10057-w.


Suppression of A549 cell proliferation and metastasis by calycosin via inhibition of the PKC‑α/ERK1/2 pathway: An in vitro investigation.

Cheng X, Gu J, Yuan J, Feng L, Jia X Mol Med Rep. 2015; 12(6):7992-8002.

PMID: 26498639 PMC: 4758323. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2015.4449.


Factors affecting tumor recurrence after curative surgery for NSCLC: impacts of lymphovascular invasion on early tumor recurrence.

Park C, Lee I, Jang S, Lee J J Thorac Dis. 2014; 6(10):1420-8.

PMID: 25364519 PMC: 4215149. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.09.31.

References
1.
Virgo K, McKirgan L, Caputo M, Mahurin D, Chao L, Caputo N . Post-treatment management options for patients with lung cancer. Ann Surg. 1995; 222(6):700-10. PMC: 1235018. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199512000-00003. View

2.
Mollberg N, Ferguson M . Postoperative surveillance for non-small cell lung cancer resected with curative intent: developing a patient-centered approach. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013; 95(3):1112-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.09.075. View

3.
Yoshino I, Yohena T, Kitajima M, Ushijima C, Nishioka K, Ichinose Y . Survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients with postoperative recurrence at distant organs. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001; 7(4):204-9. View

4.
Rubins J, Unger M, Colice G . Follow-up and surveillance of the lung cancer patient following curative intent therapy: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guideline (2nd edition). Chest. 2007; 132(3 Suppl):355S-367S. DOI: 10.1378/chest.07-1390. View

5.
Endo C, Sakurada A, Notsuda H, Noda M, Hoshikawa Y, Okada Y . Results of long-term follow-up of patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012; 93(4):1061-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.004. View