» Articles » PMID: 24167162

Motion-direction Specificity for Adaptation-induced Duration Compression Depends on Temporal Frequency

Overview
Journal J Vis
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2013 Oct 30
PMID 24167162
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Adapting to a 20 Hz oscillating grating reduces the apparent duration of a 10 Hz drifting grating displayed subsequently in the same location as the adaptor. The effect is orientation-independent as it remains once the adaptor is rotated 90° relative to the tests (Johnston, Arnold, & Nishida, 2006). However, it was shown that, for random dots moving at 3°/s, duration compression follows adaptation only when the adaptor and test drift in the same direction, and it disappears when they drift in opposite directions (Curran & Benton, 2012). Here, we explored the relationship between the relative motion direction of adaptor and test and the strength of duration compression for a wider range of speeds and for narrow-band stimuli (temporal frequencies between 3 and 18 Hz). We first measured perceived temporal frequency for the same stimuli after adaptation, and we used these estimates to match the apparent rate of the adapted and unadapted tests in the duration task. We found that, whereas at 3 Hz the effect of adaptation in the opposite direction on duration is marginal, at higher frequencies there is substantial duration compression in the opposite direction. These results indicate that there may be two contributions to apparent duration compression: a cortical contribution sensitive to orientation and motion direction at a wide range of temporal frequencies and a direction-independent subcortical contribution, which is revealed at higher frequencies. However, while direction specificity implies cortical involvement, subcortical orientation dependency and the influence of feedback to subcortical areas should not be ignored.

Citing Articles

Relative Time Compression for Slow-Motion Stimuli through Rapid Recalibration.

Kashiwakura S, Motoyoshi I Front Psychol. 2017; 8:1195.

PMID: 28769841 PMC: 5511836. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01195.


Perceived duration of brief visual events is mediated by timing mechanisms at the global stages of visual processing.

Beattie L, Curran W, Benton C, Harris J, Hibbard P R Soc Open Sci. 2017; 4(3):160928.

PMID: 28405382 PMC: 5383839. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160928.


Multiple channels of visual time perception.

Bruno A, Cicchini G Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016; 8:131-139.

PMID: 28018946 PMC: 5178882. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.02.028.


Pulse trains to percepts: the challenge of creating a perceptually intelligible world with sight recovery technologies.

Fine I, Boynton G Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015; 370(1677):20140208.

PMID: 26240423 PMC: 4528820. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0208.

References
1.
Ibbotson M . Contrast and temporal frequency-related adaptation in the pretectal nucleus of the optic tract. J Neurophysiol. 2005; 94(1):136-46. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00980.2004. View

2.
Lee B, CREUTZFELDT O, Elepfandt A . The responses of magno- and parvocellular cells of the monkey's lateral geniculate body to moving stimuli. Exp Brain Res. 1979; 35(3):547-57. DOI: 10.1007/BF00236771. View

3.
Bruno A, Johnston A . Contrast gain shapes visual time. Front Psychol. 2011; 1:170. PMC: 3153782. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00170. View

4.
Cheong S, Tailby C, Solomon S, Martin P . Cortical-like receptive fields in the lateral geniculate nucleus of marmoset monkeys. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(16):6864-76. PMC: 6618877. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5208-12.2013. View

5.
Smith A, Singh K, Williams A, Greenlee M . Estimating receptive field size from fMRI data in human striate and extrastriate visual cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2001; 11(12):1182-90. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/11.12.1182. View