» Articles » PMID: 24156027

FDG-PET As a Predictive Biomarker for Therapy with Everolimus in Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer

Overview
Journal Cancer Med
Specialty Oncology
Date 2013 Oct 25
PMID 24156027
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitor, everolimus, affects tumor growth by targeting cellular metabolic proliferation pathways and delays renal cell carcinoma (RCC) progression. Preclinical evidence suggests that baseline elevated tumor glucose metabolism as quantified by FDG-PET ([(18)F] fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography) may predict antitumor activity. Metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients refractory to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway inhibition were treated with standard dose everolimus. FDG-PET scans were obtained at baseline and 2 weeks; serial computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained at baseline and every 8 weeks. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the most FDG avid lesion, average SUVmax of all measured lesions and their corresponding 2-week relative changes were examined for association with 8-week change in tumor size. A total of 63 patients were enrolled; 50 were evaluable for the primary endpoint of which 48 had both PET scans. Patient characteristics included the following: 36 (72%) clear cell histology and median age 59 (range: 37-80). Median pre- and 2-week treatment average SUVmax were 6.6 (1-17.9) and 4.2 (1-13.9), respectively. Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST)-based measurements demonstrated an average change in tumor burden of 0.2% (-32.7% to 35.9%) at 8 weeks. Relative change in average SUVmax was the best predictor of change in tumor burden (all evaluable P = 0.01; clear cell subtype P = 0.02), with modest correlation. Baseline average SUVmax was correlated with overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.023; 0.020), but not with change in tumor burden. Everolimus therapy decreased SUVs on follow-up PET scans in mRCC patients, but changes were only modestly correlated with changes in tumor size. Thus, clinical use of FDG-PET-based biomarkers is challenged by high variability.

Citing Articles

Theranostics in Renal Cell Carcinoma-A Step Towards New Opportunities or a Dead End-A Systematic Review.

Jozwik-Plebanek K, Saracyn M, Kolodziej M, Kaminska O, Durma A, Madra W Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025; 17(12.

PMID: 39770563 PMC: 11678666. DOI: 10.3390/ph17121721.


Molecular and functional imaging in cancer-targeted therapy: current applications and future directions.

Bai J, Qiu S, Zhang G Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023; 8(1):89.

PMID: 36849435 PMC: 9971190. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-023-01366-y.


Efficacy of Pre-operative 18F-FDG PET/CT in Prognostic Prediction in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Toguchi M, Ishigami K, Goya M, Saito S, Murayama S, Nishie A Cancer Diagn Progn. 2022; 2(2):216-222.

PMID: 35399179 PMC: 8962815. DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10097.


Non-invasive molecular imaging of kidney diseases.

Klinkhammer B, Lammers T, Mottaghy F, Kiessling F, Floege J, Boor P Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021; 17(10):688-703.

PMID: 34188207 PMC: 7612034. DOI: 10.1038/s41581-021-00440-4.


Role of F-18 FDG PET/CT in the follow-up of asymptomatic renal cell carcinoma patients for postoperative surveillance: based on conditional survival analysis.

Park S, Lee H, Lee S J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021; 148(1):215-224.

PMID: 34106327 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03688-2.


References
1.
Chan D, Sutphin P, Nguyen P, Turcotte S, Lai E, Banh A . Targeting GLUT1 and the Warburg effect in renal cell carcinoma by chemical synthetic lethality. Sci Transl Med. 2011; 3(94):94ra70. PMC: 3683134. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002394. View

2.
Khandani A, Cowey C, Moore D, Gohil H, Rathmell W . Primary renal cell carcinoma: relationship between 18F-FDG uptake and response to neoadjuvant sorafenib. Nucl Med Commun. 2012; 33(9):967-73. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283561837. View

3.
Brugarolas J . Renal-cell carcinoma--molecular pathways and therapies. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(2):185-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe068263. View

4.
Brouwers A, Dorr U, Lang O, Boerman O, Oyen W, Steffens M . 131 I-cG250 monoclonal antibody immunoscintigraphy versus [18 F]FDG-PET imaging in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a comparative study. Nucl Med Commun. 2002; 23(3):229-36. DOI: 10.1097/00006231-200203000-00005. View

5.
Hudes G, Carducci M, Tomczak P, Dutcher J, Figlin R, Kapoor A . Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(22):2271-81. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa066838. View