Article: Correlation of masseter muscle thickness and intermolar width - an ultrasonography study

Background: To determine the association between the thickness of masseter muscle and the maxillary dental arch width. To explore the influence of gender on masseter muscle thickness.

Materials & Methods: Seventy subjects (35 females and 35 males) of age 18 to 25 years were selected for the study based on class I molar relationship. The masseter muscle thickness of the right and left sides in every subject were found out through ultrasound scanning of the muscle, in both relaxed and clenched states. The maxillary dental arch width was measured on the study model with an electronic caliper. Student t test, Pearson's Correlation Coefficient was performed to assess the sample.

Results: Masseter Muscle Thickness showed a positive correlation with Maxillary Dental Arch Width r ≤0.74. The masseter muscle thickness is greater in male subjects in both relaxed (0.001<p <0.00) and contracted state.

Conclusion: Masseter muscle thickness influences the growth of the jaws. Increase in masseter activity leads to an increased growth in transverse and sagittal dimensions, and decreased growth in vertical dimension. Key words: Masseter Muscle Thickness, Maxillary Dental Arch Width, Ultrasound. How to cite this article: Tircoveluri S, Singh J R, Rayapudi N, Karra A, Begum M, Challa P L. Correlation of Masseter Muscle Thickness and Intermolar Width - An Ultrasonography Study. J Int Oral Health 2013; 5(2):28-34.

Citing Articles

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Masseter Muscle in Skeletal Malocclusions (Class I, II, and III).

Imanimoghaddam M, Farzanegan F, Shakeri M, Soleymani F, Jamali Paghaleh Z Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2024; 38:97.

PMID: 39678760 PMC: 11644026. DOI: 10.47176/mjiri.38.97.

Hard and Soft Tissue Facial Landmarks for Mandibular Angle Reduction: A Clinical Study.

Tseng F, Li Y, Chen Y Clin Pract. 2024; 14(5):1707-1715.

PMID: 39311286 PMC: 11417696. DOI: 10.3390/clinpract14050136.

Ultrasonographic examination of masticatory muscles in patients with TMJ arthralgia and headache attributed to temporomandibular disorders.

Lee Y, Bae H, Chun Y, Lee J, Kim H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):8967.

PMID: 38637633 PMC: 11026518. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59316-9.

Masseter Muscle Thickness in Relation to Facial Form in Angle's Normal Occlusion and Malocclusions: An Observational Study.

Meher J, Khan S, Abhishek , Prasad K, Dixit C, Singh R J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024; 16(Suppl 1):S889-S893.

PMID: 38595353 PMC: 11000979. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1112_23.

Relationship between vertical facial morphology and dental arch measurements in class II malocclusion: a retrospective study.

Ocak I, Karsli N, Altug A, Aksu M PeerJ. 2023; 11:e16031.

PMID: 37692120 PMC: 10487581. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16031.

References

1.

Charalampidou M, Kjellberg H, Georgiakaki I, Kiliaridis S . Masseter muscle thickness and mechanical advantage in relation to vertical craniofacial morphology in children. Acta Odontol Scand. 2008; 66(1):23-30. DOI: 10.1080/00016350701884604. View

2.

Kasai K, Richards L, Kanazawa E, Ozaki T, Iwasawa T . Relationship between attachment of the superficial masseter muscle and craniofacial morphology in dentate and edentulous humans. J Dent Res. 1994; 73(6):1142-9. DOI: 10.1177/00220345940730060301. View

3.

Ueda H, Ishizuka Y, Miyamoto K, Morimoto N, Tanne K . Relationship between masticatory muscle activity and vertical craniofacial morphology. Angle Orthod. 1998; 68(3):233-8. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1998)068<0233:RBMMAA>2.3.CO;2. View

4.

Kiliaridis S, Engvall M, Tzakis M . Ultrasound imaging of the masseter muscle in myotonic dystrophy patients. J Oral Rehabil. 1995; 22(8):619-25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb01059.x. View

5.

Benington P, Gardener J, Hunt N . Masseter muscle volume measured using ultrasonography and its relationship with facial morphology. Eur J Orthod. 2000; 21(6):659-70. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/21.6.659. View

Correlation of Masseter Muscle Thickness and Intermolar Width - an Ultrasonography Study