» Articles » PMID: 24155323

Neural Underpinnings of the Identifiable Victim Effect: Affect Shifts Preferences for Giving

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Oct 25
PMID 24155323
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The "identifiable victim effect" refers to peoples' tendency to preferentially give to identified versus anonymous victims of misfortune, and has been proposed to partly depend on affect. By soliciting charitable donations from human subjects during behavioral and neural (i.e., functional magnetic resonance imaging) experiments, we sought to determine whether and how affect might promote the identifiable victim effect. Behaviorally, subjects gave more to orphans depicted by photographs versus silhouettes, and their shift in preferences was mediated by photograph-induced feelings of positive arousal, but not negative arousal. Neurally, while photographs versus silhouettes elicited activity in widespread circuits associated with facial and affective processing, only nucleus accumbens activity predicted and could statistically account for increased donations. Together, these findings suggest that presenting evaluable identifiable information can recruit positive arousal, which then promotes giving. We propose that affect elicited by identifiable stimuli can compel people to give more to strangers, even despite costs to the self.

Citing Articles

How interoceptive sensibility moderates decision-making: an fMRI study of neuroforecasting mobile games engagement.

Chen Y, Huang Y, Hsiao P, Yen N Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024; 25(2):415-433.

PMID: 39653867 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-024-01238-0.


The effect of psilocybin on empathy and prosocial behavior: a proposed mechanism for enduring antidepressant effects.

Bhatt K, Weissman C Npj Ment Health Res. 2024; 3(1):7.

PMID: 38609500 PMC: 10955966. DOI: 10.1038/s44184-023-00053-8.


Victim identifiability, number of victims, and unit asking in charitable giving.

Moche H, Karlsson H, Vastfjall D PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0300863.

PMID: 38547164 PMC: 10977801. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300863.


The relationship between charitable giving and emotional facial expressions: Results from affective computing.

Shepelenko A, Shepelenko P, Obukhova A, Kosonogov V, Shestakova A Heliyon. 2024; 10(2):e23728.

PMID: 38347906 PMC: 10859774. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23728.


The neural mechanisms of identifiable victim effect in prosocial decision-making.

Zhao H, Xu Y, Li L, Liu J, Cui F Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(2):e26609.

PMID: 38339893 PMC: 10836171. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26609.


References
1.
Preacher K, Hayes A . Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008; 40(3):879-91. DOI: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879. View

2.
Hein G, Singer T . I feel how you feel but not always: the empathic brain and its modulation. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008; 18(2):153-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2008.07.012. View

3.
Knutson B, Wimmer G, Rick S, Hollon N, Prelec D, Loewenstein G . Neural antecedents of the endowment effect. Neuron. 2008; 58(5):814-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.05.018. View

4.
Knutson B, Rick S, Wimmer G, Prelec D, Loewenstein G . Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron. 2007; 53(1):147-56. PMC: 1876732. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.010. View

5.
Grosenick L, Klingenberg B, Katovich K, Knutson B, Taylor J . Interpretable whole-brain prediction analysis with GraphNet. Neuroimage. 2013; 72:304-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.062. View