» Articles » PMID: 24152645

99mTc-sestamibi Using a Direct Conversion Molecular Breast Imaging System to Assess Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Overview
Journal Clin Nucl Med
Specialty Nuclear Medicine
Date 2013 Oct 25
PMID 24152645
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to determine the ability of breast imaging with 99mTc-sestamibi and a direct conversion-molecular breast imaging (MBI) system to predict early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

Methods: Patients undergoing NAC for breast cancer were imaged with a direct conversion-MBI system before (baseline), at 3 to 5 weeks after onset, and after completion of NAC. Tumor size and tumor-to-background (T/B) uptake ratio measured from MBI images were compared with extent of residual disease at surgery using the residual cancer burden.

Results: Nineteen patients completed imaging and proceeded to surgical resection after NAC. Mean reduction in T/B ratio from baseline to 3 to 5 weeks for patients classified as RCB-0 (no residual disease), RCB-1 and RCB-2 combined, and RCB-3 (extensive residual disease) was 56% (SD, 0.20), 28% (SD, 0.20), and 4% (SD, 0.15), respectively. The reduction in the RCB-0 group was significantly greater than in RCB-1/2 (P = 0.036) and RCB-3 (P = 0.001) groups. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for determining the presence or absence of residual disease was 0.88. Using a threshold of 50% reduction in T/B ratio at 3 to 5 weeks, MBI predicted presence of residual disease at surgery with a diagnostic accuracy of 89.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64%-0.99%), sensitivity of 92.3% (95% CI, 0.74%-0.99%), and specificity of 83.3% (95% CI, 0.44%-0.99%). The reduction in tumor size at 3 to 5 weeks was not statistically different between RCB groups.

Conclusions: Changes in T/B ratio on MBI images performed at 3 to 5 weeks following initiation of NAC were accurate at predicting the presence or absence of residual disease at NAC completion.

Citing Articles

Comparison Between Prone SPECT-Based Semi-Quantitative Parameters and MBI-Based Semi-Quantitative Parameters in Patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.

van de Burgt A, van Velden F, Corion C, Collarino A, Olmos R, Smit F Mol Imaging Biol. 2024; 26(6):926-933.

PMID: 39516430 PMC: 11634910. DOI: 10.1007/s11307-024-01959-1.


Dedicated Breast Gamma Camera Imaging and Breast PET: Current Status and Future Directions.

Narayanan D, Berg W PET Clin. 2018; 13(3):363-381.

PMID: 30100076 PMC: 6116731. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2018.02.008.


The role of molecular breast imaging in predicting complete tumor response to treatment and residual tumor extent following neoadjuvant therapy.

Nuvoli S, Galassi S, Gelo I, Rocchitta G, Fancellu A, Serra P Oncol Rep. 2018; 39(5):2055-2062.

PMID: 29512735 PMC: 5928762. DOI: 10.3892/or.2018.6299.


Comparison of Tc-99m maraciclatide and Tc-99m sestamibi molecular breast imaging in patients with suspected breast cancer.

OConnor M, Morrow M, Hunt K, Boughey J, Wahner-Roedler D, Conners A EJNMMI Res. 2017; 7(1):5.

PMID: 28091980 PMC: 5237435. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-017-0255-6.


Direct-Conversion Molecular Breast Imaging of Invasive Breast Cancer: Imaging Features, Extent of Invasive Disease, and Comparison Between Invasive Ductal and Lobular Histology.

Conners A, Jones K, Hruska C, Geske J, Boughey J, Rhodes D AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 205(3):W374-81.

PMID: 26295674 PMC: 8900216. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.13502.


References
1.
Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz L, Sargent D, Ford R . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2008; 45(2):228-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. View

2.
Fisher B, Brown A, Mamounas E, Wieand S, Robidoux A, Margolese R . Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Clin Oncol. 1997; 15(7):2483-93. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.7.2483. View

3.
Groheux D, Giacchetti S, Espie M, Rubello D, Moretti J, Hindie E . Early monitoring of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer with 18F-FDG PET/CT: defining a clinical aim. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010; 38(3):419-25. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1660-5. View

4.
Hylton N, Blume J, Bernreuter W, Pisano E, Rosen M, Morris E . Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL. Radiology. 2012; 263(3):663-72. PMC: 3359517. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12110748. View

5.
Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, Mamounas E, Brown A, Fisher E . Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998; 16(8):2672-85. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.8.2672. View