» Articles » PMID: 24151362

HER2 in Gastric Cancer: Comparative Analysis of Three Different Antibodies Using Whole-tissue Sections and Tissue Microarrays

Abstract

Aim: To compare the performance of three commercially available anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibodies in whole-tissue sections and tissue microarrays (TMAs) of a series of gastric tumors.

Methods: We present a comparative analysis of three anti-HER2 antibodies (HercepTest, 4B5 and SP3) using TMA and whole-tissue sections prepared from the same paraffin blocks of 199 gastric adenocarcinomas operated upon between January 2004 and December 2008 at a Brazilian cancer hospital. The data on the patients' age, sex, the anatomical location of the tumor and the Lauren's histological classification were collected from clinical and pathological records. The immunohistochemical (IHC) results were examined by two pathologists and the cases were classified as positive (3+), equivocal (2+) and negative (0 or 1+), according to the criteria of the IHC scoring system of gastric cancer. TMAs and whole-tissue sections were evaluated separately and independently. All cases yielding discordant IHC results and/or scored as 2+ were subjected to dual-color in situ hybridization in order to determine the final HER2 status. Besides determining the sensitivity and predictive value for HER2-positive status, we measured the accuracy of each antibody by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The agreement between the results obtained using the TMAs and those obtained using the whole-tissue sections was assessed by means of Kappa coefficient.

Results: Intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2 expression was observed with all antibodies. HER2-positive expression (3+) in the whole-tissue sections was observed in 23 cases (11.6%) using the 4B5 antibody, in 18 cases (9.1%) using the SP3 antibody and in 10 cases (5.1%) using the HercepTest antibody. In the TMAs, 11 positive cases (5.6%) were identified using SP3 antibody, 9 (4.6%) using the 4B5 antibody and 6 (3%) using the HercepTest antibody. The sensitivity using whole-tissue sections and TMA, respectively, was 95.2% and 42.9% with 4B5, 90.5% and 66.7% with SP3 and 47.6% and 42.9% with HercepTest. The accuracy, calculated from the area under the ROC curve, using whole-tissue sections and TMA, respectively, was 0.91 and 0.79 by 4B5, 0.86 and 0.80 by SP3 and 0.73 and 0.71 by HercepTest. The concordance of the results obtained using whole-tissue sections and TMA was 97.4% (Kappa 0.75) using HercepTest, 85.6% (Kappa 0.56) using SP3 and 84.1% (Kappa 0.38) using 4B5.

Conclusion: The use of the 4B5 antibody on whole-tissue sections was the most accurate IHC method for evaluating HER2 expression in gastric adenocarcinoma.

Citing Articles

Establishment of gastric cancer organoid and its application in individualized therapy.

Miao X, Wang C, Chai C, Tang H, Hu J, Zhao Z Oncol Lett. 2022; 24(6):447.

PMID: 36420067 PMC: 9647790. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2022.13567.


Molecular Pathology of Gastric Cancer.

Kim M, Seo A J Gastric Cancer. 2022; 22(4):273-305.

PMID: 36316106 PMC: 9633931. DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2022.22.e35.


Poorly cohesive cells gastric carcinoma including signet-ring cell cancer: Updated review of definition, classification and therapeutic management.

Drubay V, Nuytens F, Renaud F, Adenis A, Eveno C, Piessen G World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022; 14(8):1406-1428.

PMID: 36160745 PMC: 9412924. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i8.1406.


Influence of high altitude on the expression of HIF-1 and on the prognosis of Ecuadorian patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.

Barrera E, Martinez E, Brunaldi M, Donadi E, Sankarankutty A, Kemp R Oncotarget. 2022; 13:1043-1053.

PMID: 36128327 PMC: 9477223. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.28275.


Deviating HER2 test results in gastric cancer: analysis from the prospective multicenter VARIANZ study.

Kolbe K, Haffner I, Schierle K, Maier D, Geier B, Luber B J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022; 149(3):1319-1329.

PMID: 36030286 PMC: 9984518. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04208-6.


References
1.
Wang S, Zheng G, Chen L, Xiong B . Effect of HER-2/neu over-expression on prognosis in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012; 12(6):1417-23. View

2.
Kim K, Koh Y, Chang H, Kim T, Yook J, Kim B . Evaluation of HER2 protein expression in gastric carcinomas: comparative analysis of 1,414 cases of whole-tissue sections and 595 cases of tissue microarrays. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; 18(10):2833-40. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1695-2. View

3.
Yang J, Luo H, Li Y, Li J, Cai Z, Su X . Intratumoral heterogeneity determines discordant results of diagnostic tests for human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2 in gastric cancer specimens. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2011; 62(1):221-8. DOI: 10.1007/s12013-011-9286-1. View

4.
Jorgensen J . Targeted HER2 treatment in advanced gastric cancer. Oncology. 2010; 78(1):26-33. DOI: 10.1159/000288295. View

5.
Dicken B, Bigam D, Cass C, Mackey J, Joy A, Hamilton S . Gastric adenocarcinoma: review and considerations for future directions. Ann Surg. 2004; 241(1):27-39. PMC: 1356843. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000149300.28588.23. View