» Articles » PMID: 24150186

Huggable Communication Medium Decreases Cortisol Levels

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2013 Oct 24
PMID 24150186
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Interpersonal touch is a fundamental component of social interactions because it can mitigate physical and psychological distress. To reproduce the psychological and physiological effects associated with interpersonal touch, interest is growing in introducing tactile sensations to communication devices. However, it remains unknown whether physical contact with such devices can produce objectively measurable endocrine effects like real interpersonal touching can. We directly tested this possibility by examining changes in stress hormone cortisol before and after a conversation with a huggable communication device. Participants had 15-minute conversations with a remote partner that was carried out either with a huggable human-shaped device or with a mobile phone. Our experiment revealed significant reduction in the cortisol levels for those who had conversations with the huggable device. Our approach to evaluate communication media with biological markers suggests new design directions for interpersonal communication media to improve social support systems in modern highly networked societies.

Citing Articles

The Potential of a Robot Presence in Close Relationship to Influence Human Responses to Experimental Pain.

Nakae A, Bu-Omer H, Chang W, Kishimoto C, Onishi Y, Sumioka H Life (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40003638 PMC: 11856449. DOI: 10.3390/life15020229.


Touching at a distance: the elaboration of communicative functions from the perspective of the interactants.

Heron R, Safin S, Baker M, Zhang Z, Lecolinet E, Detienne F Front Psychol. 2025; 15:1497289.

PMID: 39744019 PMC: 11689214. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1497289.


Exploring the Psychological and Physiological Effects of Operating a Telenoid: The Preliminary Assessment of a Minimal Humanoid Robot for Mediated Communication.

Nakae A, Bu-Omer H, Chang W, Kishimoto C, Sumioka H Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(23).

PMID: 39686077 PMC: 11644294. DOI: 10.3390/s24237541.


A HUG taxonomy of humans with potential in human-robot hugs.

Yan Z, Wang Z, Ren R, Wang C, Jiang S, Zhou Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):14212.

PMID: 38902448 PMC: 11190144. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64825-8.


Embodied, visible, and courteous: exploring robotic social touch with virtual idols.

Onishi Y, Ogawa K, Tanaka K, Nakanishi H Front Robot AI. 2024; 11:1240408.

PMID: 38590970 PMC: 10999612. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1240408.


References
1.
Bartz J, Zaki J, Bolger N, Ochsner K . Social effects of oxytocin in humans: context and person matter. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011; 15(7):301-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.002. View

2.
Fisher J, Rytting M, HESLIN R . Hands touching hands: affective and evaluative effects of an interpersonal touch. Sociometry. 1976; 39(4):416-21. View

3.
Beetz A, Uvnas-Moberg K, Julius H, Kotrschal K . Psychosocial and psychophysiological effects of human-animal interactions: the possible role of oxytocin. Front Psychol. 2012; 3:234. PMC: 3408111. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00234. View

4.
Hellhammer D, Wust S, Kudielka B . Salivary cortisol as a biomarker in stress research. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2008; 34(2):163-171. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.026. View

5.
Carney D, Cuddy A, Yap A . Power posing: brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychol Sci. 2010; 21(10):1363-8. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610383437. View